Pessimism is cool, optimism isn't. Try telling someone the interesting fact that if all the ice at the north pole melts sea levels will actually fall and look at the disbelieving, unhappy expression on their face and you'll see what I mean. (Sea levels will fall of course because icebergs displace more water than the equivalent amount of water alone.) And what about the glaciers? Even with runaway global warming under the most severe models it would take 1000 years to melt the Greenland icesheets which would give us a bit of time to figure out the physics of CO2 scrubbers etc. What about species going extinct? Well, 99.99% of all animal species that have ever lived have gone extinct and the planet seems to be doing fine. No, really, unless a comet is heading our way we are not doomed.
...
This was brought home to me today by a book review I read in The New York Times by John Tierney. The book is called The Rational Optimist by Matt Ridley. Here's some of the review:
The first [doomsaying] school [of history] despairs because it foresees inevitable ruin. The second school is hopeful — but only because these intellectuals foresee ruin, too, and can hardly wait for the decadent modern world to be replaced by one more to their liking. Every now and then, someone comes along to note that society has failed to collapse and might go on prospering, but the notion is promptly dismissed in academia as happy talk from a simpleton. Predicting that the world will not end is also pretty good insurance against a prolonged stay on the best-seller list. Have you read Julian Simon’s “The State of Humanity”? Indur Goklany’s “The Improving State of the World”? Gregg Easterbrook’s “Sonic Boom”? Good books all, and so is the newest addition to this slender canon, “The Rational Optimist,” by Matt Ridley. It does much more than debunk the doomsaying. Dr. Ridley provides a grand unified theory of history from the Stone Age to the better age awaiting us in 2100.
Progress this century could be impeded by politics, wars, plagues or climate change, but Dr. Ridley argues that, as usual, the “apocaholics” are overstating the risks and underestimating innovative responses. “The modern world is a history of ideas meeting, mixing, mating and mutating,” Dr. Ridley writes. “And the reason that economic growth has accelerated so in the past two centuries is down to the fact that ideas have been mixing more than ever before.” With new hubs of innovation emerging elsewhere, and with ideas spreading faster than ever on the Internet, Dr. Ridley expects bottom-up innovators to prevail. His prediction for the rest of the century: “Prosperity spreads, technology progresses, poverty declines, disease retreats, fecundity falls, happiness increases, violence atrophies, freedom grows, knowledge flourishes, the environment improves and wilderness expands.”
...
I think a lot of people prefer the idea that everything is going to the dogs and that in the "good old days" things were better, kids knew their place, etc. Of course this is an absolute crock of shite. It may be a tediously trendy position but its a fallacious one. Professor Steven Pinker in the video above puts things in perspective.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
53 comments:
Maybe, but I don't think this factors in the existence of nuclear weapons and zealots existing on the same planet. And what about the gradual takeover of the world by China?
Sorry--it's early here, the squirrels are frolicking around in the trees and all's well with the world. But I haven't even had my coffee yet. I had to say something.
I agree with Seana, and I know several people that like to end sentences or conversations with "if we're still here by then that is", that said, it would be nice to occasionally get an email about us not being pushed into oblivion. Maybe something along the lines of the truth.
Sorry, I think my cynicism is showing..
That's some deep stuff. My take has always been, "Carpe Diem". If the shenanigans of my younger days couldn't get me, a comet doesn't stand a chance.
Now, if I was a gloom and doomer, I remember a classmate at prep school dropped this one on the class, when asked his opinion on a novel (can't recall which one)
"Our own self progression, will lead to our own self destruction."
At the time, I was more intrigued by, "He who smelt it.....
Adrian, as far as I understand, since some of the iceberg is above water, if the entire iceberg were to melt, the water level would remain exactly the same.
The issue is not floating ice but ice piled on land, on permafrost. This isn't displacing any water at the moment, and if it were to melt, it would cause substantial changes in sea levels (substantial not on a geological scale, but one a human one considering how many people now live within a meter of sea level. Plus, of course, the melting would be cause by a rise in temperature, which would also cause sea levels to rise because water expands when heated.
I'm not a doomsayer, but I do believe climate change is a serious problem.
I love the word 'apocaholics' - was it coined by John Tierney in this article, or has it been floating around like an iceberg for some time?
Seana
There are nuclear weapons but unlike say twenty years ago, I think the probability of a full scale nuclear war has fallen.
Miss Snob
Well in the long run, WE wont be here, but someone will.
Sean
Yeah I dont think it will. People hate to admit that things are getting better, but I strongly suspect that they are.
Girish
Stick a bunch of ice cubes in a glass and measure the water level. Then let the ice cubes melt and measure it again. You'll be surprised.
Well yes the glaciers on Greenland and Antarctica are melting. This is a problem but the models are clear. The Greenland icesheets are going to take a millennium to melt, those on Antarctica even longer. By then we should have figured out CO2 scrubbers or you know planted trees in Siberia or something to reverse this process. Humans are ingenious and it is a very long time.
Philip
Its a new one on me.
Yeah, I don't think it will probably be at a nations level at this point. It will just be a little cell of people who have a point of some kind and don't value human life very much. I'm not against the idea of some gradual human social betterment, by the way. It's just that one or two malcontents can wreak so much more havoc than before. Look at what a couple of guys with some fertilizer managed in Oklahoma.
This latest New Yorker on innovation is an interesting one. I haven't read much of it so far, but apparently the bottleneck isn't at the level of innovation, which is indeed percolating upward from many sources, but in the ability to apply what's innovated. Hard to train people, hard to find the necessary capital, stuff like that.
Oh yeah, and then there's 2012 to consider.
Just kidding.
Adrian - Has your model factored in the 'Patterson Effect'? You know, if a butterfly flaps its wings in Brazil, Patterson publishes another seven novels.
At the last count, he was personally responsible for the extinction of 137 species.
And no one else seems to be in the slightest bit concerned that if you flushed every one of Patterson's novels down the u-bend, the global sea-level would rise by 13 metres.
13 metres. Unlucky for some, eh?
The Patterson Effect: it's already too late.
Cheers, Dec
(v-word: mingune)
Forget what I said about bombs. Patterson is obviously the element that will help us keep the banner of pessimism aloft forever.
Seana
Yeah, I hate to say it but sooner or later someone is going to succeed in NYC. Hopefully it will only be a car bomb, which will be bad enough...
But then again I grew up in town which had a car bombing every night for about twenty years and somehow we all survived.
Dec
And there's also the toll on people walking past your living room window who will get a Patterson in the back of the head when you hurl it across the room. Its always the innocent bystanders who kop it the worst.
Last night on the TV show Castle James Patterson, Stephen Cannell and Michael Connelly were playing poker with Castle (it's a running gag on the show, Richard Castle is a mystary writer shadowing an NYPD homicide cop) and Patterson says to him, "Only one book a year?"
Of course, "Richard Castle" has already had one bestseller and after last night's show I'm guessing "he'll" have three or four more books out this year, so what's that about things getting better?
Well, it does sound as though Patterson has a sense of humor about it all, at least, if he's willing to appear on a show like that. Of course he's laughing all the way to the bank. "Castle" sounds like a fun premise--I'll have to check it out.
I concede that things certainly seem to have gotten better in Belfast. I'm only saying that the scale of destruction available to ordinary people seems only to grow.
Anyone interested in Ridley's "Optimism" book should also consider my own prior 2009 book, THE CASE FOR RATIONAL OPTIMISM, which thoroughly discusses the same points, but actually tackles the entire range of the pessimist litany. See http://www.fsrcoin.com/k.htm
The way to remain optimistic about the future of pessimism is to think small. Don't worry about that good old world out there. Cultivate your own garden, should you happen to live in certain places or work in certain industries, and you'll realize hey, things are not that great after all.
================
Detectives Beyond Borders
"Because Murder Is More Fun Away From Home"
http://detectivesbeyondborders.blogspot.com/
Yeah, I hadn't even gotten to the book industry yet, I mean the small remaining portion of the book industry that is not about James Patterson, so thanks for that.
John
Are you sure James Patterson didnt have six guys playing for him? That would make a lot more sense.
Seana
If he does have a sense of humor it doesnt get communicated to his books. That or wit.
Frank
Thanks for dropping by. If I can the chance I'll check it out. Although I dont think my natural cynicism and misanthropy can take more than one optimist tome per yer.
Peter
Me and Dec Burke and a few others have been doing a job in that line with Irish crime fiction over the last year or so.
Seana, Peter,
Lets invent an author and call him Patterson James. We'll churn out cheap and cheerful mysteries with nursery rhyme titles. If we can take 1 percent of JP's market we'll be laughing.
Adrian,
It appears Stuart Neville has himself a stalker, based on his blog post on Monday.
It made me think of a post on Peter R's blog on 5/15. Coincidence?
"What I find interesting, though, is the almost incestuous nature of the cover blurbs on all of the Irish writers books. That in itself isn't a good sign as it almost suggests a self-congratulatory cartel."
Sean
Where did that quote come from? Peter? Its nuts.
Sean
Where did that quote come from? Peter? Its nuts.
Adrian,
If I told you, I'd have to...
It was in the comment section of Peter's blog post on 5/15, by The Chosen One.
Uh oh. I'm sensing that the Chosen One's days are numbered.
Patterson James should be a woman, of course, with a sprightly sense of humor and a weakness for puns. The nursery rhyme theme can be carried through by her day job at a childcare center, and her constant recital of said rhymes will somehow help her solve the mysteries she stumbles upon in the off hours. Extremely unlikely, of course, but when has that ever stopped anyone before?
Oh, and I'd blurb a lot of Irish crime writers books, and I'm not Irish. But no one ever asks for my opinion.
Seana
Dont forget the cat. Theres got to be a cat in there somewhere.
See, I don't get John Connolly. I read two of his 'thrillers' (Bad Men and The White Road) and found them distinctly average. Then I read The Book of Lost Things and was blown away. His collection of short ghost stories is also excellent. The guy in my local crime book store said that The Book of Lost Things didn't sell at all.
I know the answer is going to be money but surely authors can be encouraged to write what they're good at instead of chasing the money
Sean
I dont know who This Chosen One is but although there is a certain collegiality amongst Irish crime writers because it is such a small field no one actually lies about books they've read. I like John Connolly as a person for example but Dec Burke and I both read the same book The Whisperers and had differing reactions but honest reactions. His review for the Irish Examiner was polite and a little frosty, my review when it comes out in the Melbourne Age will be polite and downright freezing, especially about the ending which for those of you who have seen Raiders of the Lost Ark will not come as a surprise. I still like and respect JC though, as does Dec but we're not going to mislead readers to part with their hard earned cash just because we like the man.
Rob
I agree. He and everyone else should follow their heart not the money. Fuck the money. And fuck publishers who want your stories to conform to a certain template. The market is utterly unimportant.
Is the world a better place because of Indiana Jones IV or the Star Wars prequels?
Adrian -
Good call on the icebergs melting. People, including some scientists, seem to forget that water is one (the only?) compound that actually EXPANDS when it freezes. Ergo, ice takes up more space than the same amount of water.
Damn--how could I have forgotten the cat. There can never be enough cats in detective fiction, especially if they are able to work out a few crimes on their own.
I do want to read that Book of Lost Things, though.
amen brother!
Adrian,
You and Dec are the shit. It's still amazes me that two famous, at least to me, novelists take the time to interact with their readers. I'm a huge music fan and discovering this IC scene, is like when I saw the Kings of Leon in a small club when they just came around. The music kicked ass and was so refreshing, it renewed my faith in music, something new.
Sorry to say, the world is not a better place because of their last CD, but I really hope they go back to their roots, rather than chase the money.
I'm not sure if you've been following the Yankees lately Adrian but I have to agree with your hypothesis. Things can only get better. But will they?
Brian
Even if you demonstrate to people ice melting in a glass they still dont believe it. They want to believe in the apocalypse.
Seana
Never forget the cat. Old rule of horror movies too.
Melissa
Your comment isnt showing up here but it showed up on my email notification. Google's fault I think.
So...thanks.
Matt
Your comment isnt showing up on my thing either but again showed on my email notification.
The Yankees have stunk all week havent they? Ageing staff, shaky rotation, Jeter finally showing that he is mortal and probably should only ask for a two year deal.
Still I think they'll make the playoffs.
Judging from the trouble Peter has been having, they will probably show up on the site later.
Or it could just be a sign of how things may appear to be getting better, but they really aren't.
Speaking of ice, I really like those ice ships in Lighthouse Land, which I just finished. Very good in a movie, I'd think.
Sean
Well I used to give more of a shit but now I basically dont. I used to believe in what the marketing people and editors told me, that I had to "grow a market and an audience" and all that nonsense. I used to care about reviews and not saying anything controversial or stupid in book readings etc. But then one day I wised up and thought fuck it and since then I have just stopped caring what people think of me or my writing. I dont care if I sell one book or a thousand, whats important to me now is not selling out my vision and always trying to tell the truth even if hurts.
OK, I've now confirmed from four different sources that a melting iceberg will keep water at exactly the same level.
Here's one: http://www.abc.net.au/science/surfingscientist/iceberg.htm
And here's another: http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/blueplanet/ends/further_experiments.shtml
Your comment isnt showing up here but it showed up on my email notification. Google's fault I think.
Same effing thing Google has been doing to me for about two weeks.
==============
Detectives Beyond Borders
"Because Murder Is More Fun Away From Home"
http://www.detectivesbeyondborders.blogspot.com
Girish
If I'm not mistaken I think you're from a naval background - no? So you probably have expert knowledge on this, which I shall bow to.
In a glass of ice water however the water level does fall.
In neither case will the worlds population centres be threatened.
Peter
Did it fix itself or did you have to email google?
"Did it fix itself or did you have to email google?"
Nothing on Google fixes itself. The problem still crops up. It is not, in other words, one of those things that is getting better.
==============
Detectives Beyond Borders
"Because Murder Is More Fun Away From Home"
http://www.detectivesbeyondborders.blogspot.com
Adrian, I agree the world has nothing to fear from melting icebergs.
Post a Comment