I've been reading Tony Blair's memoir A Journey for the last few days and I've been intrigued by Blair's writing style. It's not Churchillian that's for sure but seems to be - like Mr Churchill himself - a trans Atlantic amalgam. Its not quite British English, not quite American English. His vocabulary is very slangy and colloquial and this makes the book chatty and extremely readable but also robs it of gravitas. It's a strange tone to take for what essentially is a political memoir (there isn't really much autobiography).
...
It was probably a mistake on my part to get the US version of A Journey because its full of irritating parentheses explaining by elections and Arthur Scargill etc. Sonny Mehta the editor in chief at Knopf probably told Blair to unpack everything so that readers with the meanest understanding could get it (this might once have been good policy once but times have changed since Sonny's heyday and now in the age of wikipedia this thinking is completely redundant). I imagine too that the UK version doesn't begin with the gushing preface about Blair's love for America which most American citizens - including your own correspondent - will find embarrassing. I suppose the biggest surprise of the book so far is Blair's prudery: he refuses to use profanity, writing "f***ing" and even "bull****" lest anyone be upset by words which have been appearing in English publications since the time of Chaucer.
...
I haven't finished A Journey but at the moment, despite its weirdness, it's up there with Churchill's My Early Life as one of the most entertaining Prime Minister's memoirs - not a genre studded with brilliance, admittedly.
...
I have read enough to be unimpressed by the indexing job. If you look up Australia in the index there are two listings. The indexer missed Blair's visit to Australia where he stayed with the Prime Minister and spoke in front of Rupert Murdoch's business group, he somehow missed Blair's influential Australian best friend in college, and he missed the fact that Blair actually lived in Australia for nearly five years when he was a boy. This is lazy stuff from Knopf.
...
Finally I felt this clip from Apocalypse Now was appropriate (esp at 1:59) but it should NOT be watched by animal lovers. Oh and yeah, spoiler alert, this is the end of the movie.
...
And a final final thought, Peter Morgan who wrote The Queen and who owes his entire career to Blair is saying in The Daily Telegraph that Blair plagiarised him when Blair wrote about his first meeting with Queen Elizabeth. "You are my 10th Prime Minister, Winston was the first," Helen Mirren says in the film. Remarkably, in the book, the real Queen Elizabeth says exactly the same thing even though Peter Morgan says that he completely made that line up. Interesting, no?
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Tony Blair's Prose Style
Labels:
a journey,
Tony blair
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
25 comments:
I was looking up a fiction author the other day and was surprised to see that her books also came in an American version and U.K version. That surprised me. I hadn't realized, and was a bit disappointed to find out, that authors did that on a seemingly regular basis. As for Tony Blair's memoir however I suppose it makes sense considering most Americans wouldn't know what a by election was. That said, I agree it's unnecessary to have it all explained in this day and age. If you're the type to read a political memoir, you're probably also the type to research what you don't understand.
On another note, a conversation came up the other day. I was asked if I thought Lord Of The Rings was worth reading despite his pre-conceived notions of lumping it in with Harry Potter, and it was mentioned that you had rather definitive thoughts on it. I'm curious as to what you think. (I also have not read them although they are on my book shelf).
Glenna
I'm not a fan of Potter. Perhaps I would have been if I'd read them as a kid, but I find the names, the adjectives and the tone extremely off putting. I also hate the genre - for some reason a healthy minority of English people think it a good idea to pack their kids off to boarding school, when in fact it is a moral disaster.
LOTR I read when I was 10. I read it again at 11 and 14. I loved it. Its written not as a twentieth century novel but rather as a medieval epic which is why I think its best to start with The Hobbit.
I'm with you on Harry Potter, but more because it pretty much put me to sleep. I do enjoy the movies, but boarding school is pretty much a non-existent issue here. Americans just don't think about it. As for LOTR, the movies turned me off of the books and I never gave them an honest chance. I've heard from several people they are a good read however so I might just have to be a little open minded about them and give it a chance at some point.
Don't see the difference between writing the full word or using a * to block out a few letters. You either us profanity or you don't. seems like a cop out. The reference in vid clip was right on. What a great scene, in one of my all time favorite movies, with a tremendous soundtrack.
I was the one over at Glenna's blog asking about LOTR. I just might read "The Hobbit" someday.
I wonder if there will be an Australian edition, with a preface saying how much Tony loves Australians. Come to think of it, he may have to write an awful lot of prefaces.
Sean and Glenna, maybe you should each read the Hobbit at some point with your kids, and then move on to LOTR yourselves if the spirit moves you.
I had a funny experience when I went and saw the first movie. I hadn't remembered how scary the first book was, and realized about 15 minutes in that I was pretty much going to be on the edge of my seat the entire time, which I wasn't actually prepared for.
I was really hoping Queen E II might have been one the commenters, setting the record straight here.
Seana
Yes the Australian edition will probably say that.
I wonder that Peter Morgan is SO sure that he didn't hear that somewhere.
Glenna
I just dont think its a book for adults. I really just dont get it.
Sean
Try The Hobbit but if you dont like it there's no point trying LOTR. Its not your thing.
I'm with Sean on this one. I'm guessing that A Journey was written with an adult or at least teenage reader in mind, so who the hell cares if a curse word appears in the text?
People curse. Kids know this and do it when adults aren't listening. Cursing isn't the end of the world.
Besides, what's the point of writing f***ing? Anyone who reads that in a book will know exactly what Blair is saying. So, why then is it better to write "f***ing" as opposed to "fucking" when the effect is almost exactly the same on the reader?
Ridiculous.
Adrian, most of the adults that I know that like it weren't big readers and gave it a try because of the hype. I'm thinking they just don't have anything to compare it to or know what all is out there. This coming from a mom that likes the Twilight books...gotta love the irony.
Seana, I'm thinking about doing that. I think my son would probably like it, and like the LOTR series. It's right up his proverbial alley.
I once received a death threat for giving the fourth HP book a bad review on the wireless.
When I say bad review, I completely destroyed it and insulted the kind of adults who adored the books but still, death threats was a bit harsh
Brian
There is an audio book version read by Blair himself. I wonder what he did there? Blair is a Christian and a recent convert to evangelical Catholicism but if they upset you so much why bother using the words in the first place?
Glenna
I REALLY dont think Twilight is my thing but I cant say anything bad (or at all) about it because I havent read the book or seen the films. From what I've heard they are empowering for young girls which has got to be a good thing.
Rob
What is it about Harry Potter? I understand children having a fantasy about escaping to a boarding school in Scotland where they do magic and there are no bossy parents...but why adults buy into this twee, smug, obnoxious, bourgeois, deeply perverse universe I do not get.
It's funny, but though I've steered clear of the HP phenomenon to the degree that I was able, a lot of adults I know who read quite a bit of different stuff have gotten into the Potter series. I think most of them--though not all--got into it through reading it with their kids. And I think the family excitement around it--everyone knowing the story, getting dressed up for the release nights, going out at midnight and meeting a lot of other fans and then staying up all night reading the books was the real driving force behind sales, and mostly benign, despite the publisher's insane rules about release dates.
I've probably said this about Harry Potter here before, but I think it started out really hitting a nerve with people who feel they are special in some as yet unrecognized way. You know, that feeling kids get when they think they're adopted, when they think that everything in their life is false and they're destined for something better and more exciting. It's not just escaping into a fantasy or an adventure because one presents itself and could happen to anyone - it's the specialness that's the key.
You can never go wrong telling your readers they're absolutely fantastic and special and no one else really understands them.
(and really, no group is as smugly superior these days as 'readers' - the internet just opened up for them, I mean come on, a place where knowing grammar can mean something??? ;)
John, this air of specialness as opposed to ordinary every day human beings was exactly my problem with the first movie, which is mostly the extent of my knowledge of the HP universe.
But yes, we've probably both said it all before.
Seana
Well I definitely dont want to argue with that. Any book that gets adults and children together to read can only be a good thing.
The wilder claims for Potter (that it was creating a brand new generation of readers and book lovers) have not materialised.
John
Yes thats definitely part of it.
Not to go all lefty (again) but I do think its a very bourgeois English vision of empowerment.
I remember watching Star Wars and liking the fact that Luke Skywalker was a nobody taking on Lord Vader and saving Princess Leia but then they ruined it by giving him a royal lineage...
But yes I can see what you mean, I'm sure every teenager at some point thinks (or wishes) that they were a changeling. Its powerful stuff.
Adrian, Twilight seems to be mostly a female thing. I know a few married men that like it, but they can't seem to explain why, and it doesn't make sense to me, (other than maybe their wives like it and they wanted to join in the fun).
Seana, that would make sense to me. If my kids were into Harry Potter, I would definitely get into it just for the family fun aspect.
The Twilight films are definitely for women - Jacob standing in the rain with his shirt off..helloo baybeee it doesn't get better than that.
I wonder if the profanity is included in the UK version?
David
Its got to be. He would be mocked mercilessly if not.
I've just watched the Katie Couric interview and thought he did very well although he did have a sympathetic interviewer and audience.
The protester was indicative of the kind of 'Socialist Worker' nonsense that ruins any valid protest.
Bah, humbug. I feel like a naysayer, in my own taste of not liking Harry Pottery books, LOTR or the Twilight series, but I cast no aspersions on anyone who likes either Harry Potter or LOTR.
Adults whom I know well like the HP books and read them to their children or grandchildren or for themselves.
For the Twilight books, I understand teen-age girls liking them, but not adults. I question why there are so many vampire-themed paperbacks on the mass market best-sellers' list. I do not get it at all. What is the attraction? Help me out here.
Post a Comment