| AC Grayling |
...
It was a bit of a surprise to read in The Guardian yesterday that he's gone off and founded a New College of the Humanities in Bloomsbury, London which will be charging 18,000 pounds a year for a B.A. What will you be getting for your 18 grand? Well Grayling has assembled a small but heavy weight team of international professors for his institute. It is not an eclectic bunch. There is only one women on the faculty and only one minority. The rest are all Anglo-American white guys of a certain age. Among the big names are Richard Dawkins, Ronald Dworkin, Niall Ferguson, Stephen Pinker, Steve Jones, Peter Singer, Grayling himself. By good fortune I've either had seminars with or heard lectures from most of Grayling's faculty, so I'm in a position to save you some cash which you can then use to go to a proper Uni with a diversity of voices and viewpoints (and where you might see the occasional lecturer under 40 or a woman or someone who didn't grow up in the Anglo-American academic tradition).
1. AC Grayling: I've heard him lecture and I've read one of his books. Not a deep thinker, more of a media personality.
2. Simon Blackburn: I've heard him lecture and heard him frequently on the radio. Blackburn, like Grayling is a historian of philosophy and a bit of a lightweight.
3. Sir David Cannadine: Cannadine is a fairly minor historian of royalty in Britain (hence the knighthood). No real original ideas. Read half of one of his books.
4. Linda Colley: This will make you laugh, Linda Colley, the only woman on the faculty, is David Cannadine's wife. She's also a minor historian.
5. Sir Richard Dawkins: I've heard him lecture many times at Oxford and I've read five of his books. His thesis? Nothing Earth shattering: every species on the planet got here through natural selection and there is no evidence for the existence of God. Er, that's about it, really.
7. Ronald Dworkin: Another philosopher. I've had tutorials with him and I've read 4 of his books. He believes in natural rights and says that these rights permeate the common law of England and America. He's good is Dworkin, maybe not 18 grand good, but he's good. Jeremy Bentham called natural rights nonsense on stilts and neither Dworkin nor any other believer in them has ever really explained where these rights actually come from.
8. Peter Singer: Yet another philosopher. I've heard him lecture a couple of times. Singer is a very smart guy. He's an animal rights activist and an ethicist. Again don't know if he's worth 18 big ones.
...
So that's about two thirds of his faculty covered and they all look pretty similar dont they? No real radicals who will challenge each other's world views and make the students think. The Guardian has also broken a story that Grayling has ripped off the curriculum of the University of London for many of his courses. Dear oh dear when the professor's a plagiarist what hope do the students have? To me this "university" seems less about providing students with a rich and interesting education and more about providing a retirement fund for Mr Grayling and his aging chums.
21 comments:
You know what i discovered? You can sit in on lectures without actually attending the university. I did practically a whole film studies course like that. I thought it was wise to keep my contributions to a minimum though.
Man, you are ON today.
I haven't read Dworkin, but what you describe sounds pretty far from Singer, who's very utilitarian. Singer even believes that babies with a certain level of birth defect should be euthanized, on utilitarian grounds. (Or at least, he argued that in a book of his which I read 20 years ago -- he may believe differently now).
I would imagine that conflicts pretty strongly with a natural rights position, so there may be some interesting disagreements there.
Dawkins sticks out to me as the odd man out, since he's an evolutionary biologist (and is pretty well respected in the field, according to my wife who was getting a PhD in a related field). Sure, he's written the anti-god stuff, but he's no more a philosopher than Stephen Gould was a sports journalist, despite his writing on baseball.
That is not A.C. Grayling.
I wouldn't have thought you would so have taken against a man who sits in his bath reading Moliere.
I know that 18,000 pounds a year must sound like a shocker to the English, but small and not terribly distinguished colleges here often are comparable.
No single teacher has to be worth the whole 18,000, do they. Plus, Bloomsbury? That's got to be worth some of the price tag right there.
I think my problem would be more that it doesn't sound like a very wide range of the humanities--more social science than anything else, a field I've always been a bit dubious about.
I think it will probably attract the sort of people who will be thrilled by it, though.
A friend was telling me just yesterday about a similar sort of school, where a bunch of heavyweights are going to assemble in Arizona and teach ethical conversation or something like that, related to the Gifford massacre. It seemed an odd way to go about it to us. I tried to find a link, but I don't have enough details to narrow it down enough.
There is an education bubble coming up fast similar to the housing bubble in the US. In the same way people were given mortgages they had no real chance to pay back, there are now billions in student loans being given out with no hope of repayment.
Lots of schools have started up with pretty much the only goal of signing up studens who qualify for student loans.
Canada isn't quite the same (as we weren't with the housing bubble) but, oh, we want to be. Plenty of lobbyists are working to get their hands on any kind of loan backed by the government.
Now, I'm not suggesting these fine philosophers are only doing this for the money, but if their institution qualifies for student loans...
Frankie
I was in a lecture on Homer once which I hadnt signed up for and got asked a question. I bluffed my way through it but I didnt have the nerve go back.
Jim
Thanks man.
Gav
Yup classic rights v utility argument in theory, but in practice they are both men of the left. To get a real clash of ideas you would need an Alasdair MacIntyre in there, or maybe a feminist critic or two.
Seana
Are you sure? I met the man and was very distracted by his long silver locks.
Living in Bloomsbury is going to cost you a fortune so I imagine this "university" education is going to run to about 60,000 USD per year. And for what? A staff of 12 people who're all pretty much the same. You can go to the Birkbeck college or SOAS or UCL which are all in Bloomsbury and get a better education for half the price.
John
I think you're right. There has to be a reckoning. 100 years ago half of all US students were NOT going to college and the population was a lot less so there has been a real explosion of higher learning in the last few years financed as you say largely by loans. With youth unemployment so high why would you risk going to uni?
Dear oh dear, people are getting quite worked up about this...
I can see how you might get mixed up, especially after a few beers.
I know the name is now anathema to you, but the New Yorker had a sort of interesting piece about the explosion in college entry just recently. I only had time to read some of it, and it was typically confusing because it was saying that most of the explosion is occurring in the highly technical fields, but that the only real development of the mind through this level of education was happening in the humanities.
So maybe Michael Gambon, I mean Grayling, is right to charge more.
Actually, if it was Mr.Gambon, I'd sign up.
Also, I don't really get the protests. No one is forcing them to go there, are they?
This is a trend in the UK started by Cameron and his Big Society:"Free Schools" where anyone can set a school up and get government funding to do it.
It's being championed by the odious Education Minister, Michael Gove and the big celebrity supporter is the even more odious Toby Young.
The big issues with it are rich people setting upi schools for rich people's children whilst poor areas get nothing and faith schools.
I never like political hyperbole but there seems to be a smidgen of truth in the complaint that the current UK government hates children
I think it's an American tradition too, Rob, and in case I may be sounding more pro school for rich people than I am, I'm not. If Grayling's school is a prototype for education to come rather than just an anomaly. Presumably it's the spreading of the model that caused the protest.
Seana
Its not on letting off smoke bombs and firing stink bombs and the like. He's an eejit not Gadhaffi.
Rob
I'm always amazed that 5 percent of British students go to private school yet dominate entire professions and institutions like the BBC.
Some guy was on Simon Mayo and Mark Kermode's film review show on Radio 5 talking about a sci-fi film he'd made called Attack The Block. He described how he'd had to do almost anthropological research into how working class kids actually talk so he could get the dialogue right. Who is this asshole I thought to myself and I googled him and it turned out he'd gone to Marlborough or Charterhouse which explained a lot. Of course Mayo and Kermode went to private school also so they didnt notice how weird it was.
Adrian,
Hey, uh, JJ DeCeglie here.
Am a 30 year old writer in Melbourne, moved over from Fremantle about 5 months ago.
Patrice Carrer from 13th note Editions dropped you a line for me.
My website is at www.jjdeceglie.com
email is: jjdeceglie@yahoo.com.au
Sorry about contacting you this way. I was hoping for a pint with ya is all.
Advice and the like.
Joe Cornish and he went to Westminster with Louis Theroux.
Attack the Block, btw, is wonderful
I wonder if people said / say the same thing about Naropa, at least at the outset. The writers buddies getting together under the Buddhist auspices and teaching and then partying in Boulder.
The good point here is the lack of diversity among staff - which is relevant, yes, as relevant as hell. I wouldn't want to question the credentials of any individual teacher. The point is that the package as a whole is well-known public academics who are outspoken in their academic ethnocentrism, i.e. argue that western civilization is superior (measured by its own parameters - which of course would make it so. The medieval church would have said the same about modern medicine - yes, surgery and antibiotics save lives, "but we save souls, don't we?") that "atheist humanism" is the sole valid alternative to religion's mass-consolations, and that critical thinking is at the root of all, so long as that doesn't involve adopting a critical stance towards what critical thinking they do. The problem with this, is that at root, it is brainwashing and not education - and is therefore a kind of scam. A liberal education could centre on western thought and ideas 400 years ago, because in practice we had access to little else. But the same education today is not liberal but reactionary. What about oriental philosophy? What about Native American wisdom? Any educational programme which throws these out on the basis of an a priori assumption about the "superiority" of mainstream western cultural agendas is fundamentally mediocre, however many star-like names it can list onto its faculties, like beads on a string.
Post a Comment