Thursday, May 24, 2012

Wolf Hall & Bring Up The Bodies

Thomas Cromwell, badass
Let's talk first about the thing that few reviewers seem to want to talk to about: religion. As well as being a clever work of art Wolf Hall is a sustained and subtle attack on the authority of the Catholic church and its role in English affairs. Most reviewers of Hilary Mantel's Booker Prize winning novel have somehow missed this overt agenda but when you grow up in Northern Ireland (with the sixteenth century Protestant-Catholic conflict regrettably still alive and well) you readily see what Mantel is up to. In 1935 Sir Thomas More was canonised by Pope Pius XI and his PR has been nothing less than excellent since, that is until Mantel got on the case. GK Chesterton, A Man For All Seasons, The Six Wives of Henry VIII etc. have all cast More as a witty man of principle attempting to deal with a bullying King Henry and a treacherous Thomas Cromwell. Mantel aggressively subverts this story in a way that only someone who suffered at a Catholic boarding school can. In Wolf Hall More is not the genial pacifist of the legend but in fact is a chilly religious fanatic who gets his kicks from torturing and burning alive those who dared to commit such heinous crimes as doubting the existence of purgatory or translating the Holy Bible into English. Thomas Cromwell by contrast is a smart, liberal, worldly man of the streets who has lived and fought all over Europe. Mantel's Cromwell is a good husband, a good father, a wit, he speaks half a dozen languages and he is tolerant of error. In a now famous passage Cromwell's talents are touched on:


His speech is low and rapid, his manner assured; he is at home in courtroom or waterfront, bishop’s palace or inn yard. He can draft a contract, train a falcon, draw a map, stop a street fight, furnish a house and fix a jury. He will quote you a nice point in the old authors, from Plato to Plautus and back again. He knows new poetry, and can say it in Italian. He works all hours, first up and late to bed. 


I wasn't convinced by Wolf Hall when I first read it. Do we really need another book about Thomas More and Henry VIII, I asked myself? We've got The Tudors on the telly, we've had several versions of A Man For All Seasons and numerous historical novels about this period in history. We also had this episode drummed into us in school and on half a dozen BBC history programmes. What else new is there to say? Well, quite a lot actually. Wolf Hall and Bring Up The Bodies together form a strident counter narrative to the prevailing view. The history I got in school was the story of a greedy Henry VIII and an evil Thomas Cromwell destroying the monasteries, places of learning and charity. Mantel, as any good defence lawyer will do, goes a bit overboard to show us that the monasteries were in fact places of corruption, sloth, cruelty, stupidity and pederasty. 
...
Of course we also get the story of the women of the time, especially Anne Boleyn and Jane Seymour. Anne is clever but indiscreet, Jane is simple, coy and beautiful. The young Queen Elizabeth is a spiky ginger and Queen Mary is a cold religious prude. But the real heart of these two novels is Cromwell. Mantel's Thomas Cromwell has become one of the richest and most interesting heroes of contemporary literature. It's obvious why this novel is more popular amongst women than men, because the Thomas Cromwell of Wolf Hall is an idealised male lead, impossible for any man to live up to. Whether the real Thomas Cromwell was anything like him I have no idea, but judging from the achievements of his children and wards I'd say that Mantel's take is probably closer to the mark than the villainous coxcomb of A Man For All Seasons. Early in Bring Up The Bodies Cromwell builds a tennis court at his home in London and his game play is described as a strategic, clever and canny, just the way you'd expect it to be. Mantel's Cromwell we come to realize is the true "man for all seasons" and the ball is now firmly in the court of the defenders of Sir/Saint Thomas More to attempt to return Mantel's devastating double volley.

33 comments:

Charlotte - why not? said...

Has anything good ever come from religion? I believe that the blame for all the major problems of the world can be laid at the feet of religion. Also, England. Religion and England.

seana said...

Glad you changed your tune. A little.

adrian mckinty said...

Charlotte

While I agree that nothing good has come from religion, I wouldnt agree with you on England. How about Shakespeare, Jane Austen, Dickens, Hardy, The Rolling Stones, Isaac Newton, the steam engine, Monty Python, penicillin...

adrian mckinty said...

Seana

I have changed my tune. Wolf Hall is dense but it is not especially so. Bring Up The Bodies isn't quite as brilliant but its very good.

Cary Watson said...

I think I'd omit Hardy in favour of cream teas.

Charlotte - why not? said...

Yes, there have been some skilled and talented English people. It's sometimes hard to remember that England is made of English people.

Kate said...

Charlotte,
How is England different from other world powers?

Adrian,
Even though they don't belong to an organized religion, some of your characters, like Killian, seem pretty spiritual. Does spirituality have value?
I couldn't live under Sharia law but Islamic art can be pretty awe-inspiring. I don't know enough about history; maybe places like Moorish Spain would've achieved greatness even without religion.

adrian mckinty said...

Cary

I skip the cream teas and substitute real ale.

adrian mckinty said...

Charlotte

I'd say that pound for pound England boxes well above its weight in world culture. And its fair to say that England more or less invented the modern world in the nineteenth century.

adrian mckinty said...

Kate

Its an important distinction isn't it? I'm with Novalis who said that "inward goes the way full of mystery." A spiritual quest seems like a fine and rewarding way to lead ones life. But any priest or monk or minister or rabbi who tells you that they know what happens after death or has proof of the existence of God is either a liar or a charlatan or just plain deluded.

seana said...

I liked the New Yorker article James Woods did on the books. I thought it was good on analyzing what sets her novels apart from other types of historical fiction writing.

Although I loved Wolf Hall, I haven't really felt like rushing out to read the sequel, I don't know why. Have to be in the right mood for it I guess.

adrian mckinty said...

Seana

It was a good article. He quotes the same passage that struck me when I read it or tried to read it last year and its the same passage that Hitchens liked too.

He doesnt really touch on the oddness of the prose style which put me off a bit until I got into it. Its very peculiar. Sort of faux Elizabethan, faux Victorian with no contractions or slang but weird deliberate anachronisms especially in direct speech.

You'd like Bring Up The Bodies. Its very much a revenge story on the men who brought down the Cardinal, even if that revenge takes Cromwell down too. Its a sort of sixteenth century Get Carter.

seana said...

But you know I'm not into revenge. Except when I am.

I think it's her weird prose style that attracts me, because really I'm not a big historical fiction reader. I also enjoyed her earlier book on the French Revolution, though I have to admit that I stopped somewhere.

Charlotte - why not? said...

Adrian,

Are you saying that England created the world we're currently inhabiting in the 19th century? I don't think I agree with that. There were plenty of very influential people and ideas from other countries, also in the 19th century (and other eras) that have endured. Freud comes to mind. What I'm talking about with England is primarily the whole empire thing. Very destructive idea that led to many horrible things.

adrian mckinty said...

Charlotte

The industrial revolution, the scientific revolution, ending the slave trade, multiparty democracy, factory acts, modern sanitation...you know that kind of thing.

England's wasn't the first or the last of the Empires. And it certainly wasn't the worst. And I should also stress that but for the backbone of the people of England in 1940 this blog or its equivalent would be in German.

adrian mckinty said...

Charlotte

Oh and there's this little place in England called Cambridge University alma mater of Isaac Newton and Stephen Hawking which has done more to improve the lot and understanding of mankind than any other institution in the world:

http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/about/awards-announcements-and-prizes/nobel-prize-winners/

Would you really prefer to live in a world without electricity, antibiotics, modern science, parliamentary democracy, football, Shakespeare, Jane Austen, trains and Monty Python? It sounds ghastly to me.

Charlotte - why not? said...

OK, so England was able to eventually find sutions to the problems it created. I'm not saying that England hasn't contributed anything to make people's lives better. As you said, England's boxed well above its weight. That's part of the problem, I guess. It's influence has been huge, for good and for ill. Yes, there've been other empires; but England's was recent and bigger and lasted longer. Regarding World War 2, you've got me there. They definitely fought long and hard.

Charlotte - why not? said...

Yikes! OK, you win. Have you been to law school by any chance?

seana said...

Charlotte, how did you ever guess?

Eesti said...

The book is also quite vague about whether Anne Boleyn was actually guilty of the crimes she was accused of. Cromwell runs through incidences he can use as proof against her and rumors he collects to bolster up his case. I think part of what Mantel's Cromwell is doing is building his legal case in his head and checking for loopholes that might come up. I don't think that Mantel is implying that she was truly guilty of every one of the crimes, but that it was expedient for Cromwell and the king for her to be convicted. Eliminating Anne Boleyn was a necessity for him since the king wanted it so. Conveniently, Anne is depicted as a scheming, desperate woman who is easily disliked by the reader. Her intelligence and her desire to use the wealth from the Dissolution of the Monasteries for charitable purposes are not depicted well even though it is entirely probable that this clash with Cromwell set them against one another.

Simon said...

Great post Adrian. I was impressed with Wolf Hall and hope to get to Bring Up The Bodies shortly. I think Mantel deserves credit for giving new perspectives on a topic (The Tudors)that's been done to death.

adrian mckinty said...

Seana, Charlotte

Uh, yeah. 3 years. Fat lot of good its ever done me.

adrian mckinty said...

Simon

And yes it really is a new perspective, all the others are basically retreads of the same story.

adrian mckinty said...

Eesti

My take is that the men were innocent. At least in the novel, anyway. I think Mark was just repeating gossip, but really there was no evidence of any wrong doing.

That whole thing with the "right forefoot" etc. I think showed that this was all an excuse for Cromwell to get revenge on the men who had mocked and brought down his beloved Cardinal. Call Me and Richard point out that Cromwell might be pulling the temple down on his own head as well but Cromwell doesn't care. He singled those men out for revenge, he singled Wyatt out to be saved (for sticking up for the Cardinal) and like Jack Carter or the Continental Op. he used his smarts to unleash havoc and get his vengeance and to hell with the consequences.

Sheiler said...

Stephen Fry did an incredible take down of the Catholic Church. I kept forwarding the youtube video to family. He too recommended Wolf Hall, which I haven't gotten to. But now that it's gotten the AM seal of approval, I shall put it on my list.

Adrian, you urged me to read Another Bullshit Night in Suck City. Found out that the tiniest library ever (in Hull, MA) had it, so I was able to read it. Loved it. I kept thinking that Flynn wrote with great verve and flow like a rhythm guitarist but edited his work like a poet. I finally checked out the back cover to read his bio - and guess what.

Well, I don't know about the guitar part.

But thanks for pointing me toward him.

seana said...

It just occurred to me that Mantel's Cromwell is the Michael Forsythe of Tudor England. His character has the same kind of enormous energy and appeal, despite his thuggish ways. The vengeance motive holds true as well.

I'm sure that there is an interview or twenty that tells why Mantel latched on to Cromwell, but I haven't seen any.

adrian mckinty said...

Sheiler

Another Bullshit Night is a great Boston book isn't it? I was fortunate enough to read three fantastic memoirs in a row last year: Patti Smith's Just Kids, Flynn's Another Bullshit Night In Suck City and Werner Herzog's Conquest of the Useless.

adrian mckinty said...

Seana

I dont know how and why she latched onto this period, unless it was mistrust of the More worship that sucked her in?

seana said...

This short interview with her popped up pretty easily and actually answers my question.

genevieve said...

It's been clear that Mantel is bent on rehabilitating Cromwell from the outset. I do like the look of Wood's review, thanks Seana.
Reminds me a little of the brouhaha here all those years back when Kate Grenville claimed that fiction made for better historical truth than history. Not that Mantel is silly enough to do that of course.
Not sure I want to read either of them - I would prefer to return to Ford Madox Ford's whopping book on Henry VIII if I ever get back to it (can't remember its name, it's so long since I attempted it). But it is fascinating that Mantel has attracted such a big readership, and as you point out, by doing the reverse of what Bolt did for More.

adrian mckinty said...

Seana

Ahh, thanks for that.

adrian mckinty said...

Gen

I'm normally pretty cynical about things. Most of the "event books" we are given as consumers are very poor books accompanied by very impressive marketing machines, but this one is a little different. Both Wolf Hall and Bodies are actually good books. Occasionally one or two will slip in there in amongst the overhyped dross.

seana said...

You're welcome. I like her.