I reviewed the latest Lee Child in Saturday's Melbourne Age thus:
61 Hours
Like an un-killable creature in a Stephen King novel, Lee Child cannot now be stopped save by inordinate supernatural methods. Over the last decade he has joined Dan Brown and James Patterson in that pantheon of modern novelists who write critic-proof, guaranteed best sellers. If his publishers are to be believed a Lee Child book is sold somewhere in the world every second; this is no small achievement in what are bleak times for publishing houses seeking to lure young males from video games, television and surfing the internet, for, ehm, entertainment.
...
Child excites envy and a grudging admiration among his peers. In their recent novel The Max Ken Bruen and Jason Starr described a sleazy and hilarious Lee Child clone called Sebastian nefariously patrolling the Greek Islands. Far from being offended at this portrayal of himself as an aging Lothario, Child read out portions of The Max at his launch party in New York. The fact that he can laugh at himself is not surprising for although his books are dark and violent, there’s a vein of ironic humour running through them too.
...
Each new Lee Child novel is a continuation of the adventures of ex US military policeman Jack Reacher as he wanders the Earth like a latter day Kane from Kung Fu, never actually seeking trouble but somehow always finding it. 61 Hours takes place, obviously, over sixty one hours in the fictional town of Bolton, South Dakota during a blizzard. Jack Reacher has hitch-hiked a lift on a tourist bus full of pensioners which skids and breaks down on a lonely highway. He and the tourists must hunker down in Bolton while the snowstorm passes.
...
Meanwhile the overstretched Bolton Police Department is on high alert because they have received a tip that a witness in a drugs deal is about to meet a sticky end via an out of state assassin. Throw in a lawless gang of bikers, a secret cold war base, a prison escape drama and a Mexican drug kingpin and you have all elements for a terrific thriller. The great location, the weather and the time compression make this one of the best books I have read in the Reacher series. There’s a little of Fargo and Ice Station Zebra in 61 Hours but that is no bad thing and although it’s pretty obvious what’s going to happen from about a third of the way in, you keep reading because you know that when all hell breaks loose it is going to be spectacular.
...
Like a building on the frozen tundra Child’s prose is utilitarian and without unnecessary ornament. His sentences are terse and effective. Wit however permeates the book, from sly observations of prison etiquette to a funny riff on the names of Brazilian soccer players. I also like Reacher’s quintessentially American self confidence and natural authority. He is a modern form of that iconic male fantasy figure, the laconic cowboy who rides into town, sets the world to rights, breaks a few heads and hearts, rides out of town. Reacher is a true nomad with no family ties and who, eccentrically, doesn’t even like to stop moving to do his laundry. He is cast in the same mould as Shane or Ethan Edwards in The Searchers. This can have its drawbacks too: despite falling frequently in jeopardy you’re never really worried for Reacher because you know that he’s faster, smarter and more competent than everyone else in the book and that whatever happens he will live to see Jack Reacher #15, which should be along this time next year.
...
But this is probably why Lee Child is so popular. Men need an escape from their desperate suburban world of school runs, windowless offices and Saturday morning trips to Ikea. Tough guy Jack Reacher doesn’t go to Ikea, when Jack Reacher needs a chair he takes his Bowie knife, walks into the forest and whittles one. Reacher’s fans should be pleased by 61 Hours. Child shows no sign of embracing the defensive (and usually disastrous) career arc that sees some popular writers trying their hand at more serious novels or non fiction investigations, of, say Jack the Ripper. With Reacher #14 Child sticks to his guns (and fists). Still, I can’t help but feel that Child has the intelligence and skill to stretch himself more than he allows. I wouldn’t mind seeing Reacher in the throws of loneliness or despair or the odd existential panic, you know, like the rest of us. And with large portions of the world’s forests apparently getting pulped to be turned into Jack Reacher novels it would be nice if they occasionally focused on complicated adult problems that can’t always be solved by a well aimed kick to the solar plexus.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
20 comments:
Not like I need a lot of convincing to read Lee Child, but this review puts me all in. The Reacher series could easily become self-parody; the innate wit with which Child writes--probably unavoidable from what I've heard of him and seen at conferences--keeps the character from becoming a caricature of himself.
It would be nice, though, to see a little self-doubt or self-examination from Reacher. Not so much that it weakens him, but to provide a little more depth to our understanding. Something along the lines of what Robert Crais has been doing with Joe Pike.
Never read him but I think I'll like him. This sounds pretty good fun.
Now I have this image of Reacher facing down a gang of assasins in an Ikea...
I just can't get into the Reacher novels. I can't buy into an action hero whose creator never lets him take a beatdown. His stories remind me of the Steven Seagal films I watched when I was a kid; I like the hero's politics, but the guy never lets anyone lay a finger on him. Like Dana mentions, Reacher would do well to go one-on-one with a grizzly bear to remind him who's the boss around here.
I did meet the guy at a Bouchercon a few years back, and he is a very nice fellow with, as Adrian notes, a self-effacing sense of humour. I do wonder if he wrote for the A-Team at one point as they seem very similar to the Reacher novels in terms of structure - each installment Reacher visits another part of the US, and has to deal with an evil corporate boss, drug dealer, etc., etc.
He's no Dirk Pitt
LOVE the Reacher novels. Can't wait for the next installment!! I discovered Reacher a few years and always look forward to this time of year!! I was a bit disappointed that the previous book did not have the Reacher signature move - the headbutt. I do hope that it makes a return in this book.
Melissa, I had a woman customer come in over the weekend who spoke in equivalent terms of rapture over Reacher--maybe it was you?
She said they were dark and violent and not normally her kind of thing at all and she didn't know why but she just had to read them. And, though I haven't read Child, I said that I knew the feeling...
My v word is 'adoption' which had better not be some kind of weird portent.
Tough guy Jack Reacher doesn’t go to Ikea, when Jack Reacher needs a chair he takes his Bowie knife, walks into the forest and whittles one.
Is he Chuck Norris?
I actually have a Jack Reacher somewhere - bought during my latest dragnet at the used books stall (for 1/5 of a euro). Can't say I was looking forward to reading it.
All those years reading comics have spoiled me. I need flaws, existential angst and complicated adult feelings in my superheroes.
But wit makes up for a lot, doesn't it? I actually have Bad Luck and Trouble so I'll give that one a shot when I get the chance. Which unfortunately won't be all that soon.
I read three Jack Reacher books a while back (#s 2-4, I think), but I couldn't get over each one needing some huge suspension of disbelief to get through.
****SPOILERS*****************
There's one where the plot hinges on people being hypnotized to swallow their tongues. Or another where Reacher is implicated in a kidnapping because there's a video camera that takes pictures every 3 seconds, and it just happens that his actions in the store look incriminating when seen every three seconds.
That's leaving out the minor improbabilities like Mexican illegal immigrants who quote Montesquieu (or whoever it was).
Wasn't it the Red Queen who advised that we should believe three impossible things before breakfast? Suspension of disbelief only takes a little practice...
I guess my problem was reading the novels after breakfast, instead of before.
I’ve read all of Lee Child’s books and liked them at first but his protagonist Jack Reacher has been getting more and more preachy. The last one – Nothing to Lose, where he fights the people of Despair from the town of Hope -- was especially disappointing. It jumped the shark.
The archetype in the first several books was much more aligned with Dirty Harry or Shane (the one-man army) but now comes off like Michael Moore. He morphed from being the strong silent type with a moral compass into a cardboard character lecturing readers about how stupid we all are.
Lee Child should invent a new character or a new series, rather than ruin our hero. I wish he'd grind his ax elsewhere, maybe write nonfiction, if his goal is to shove his political agenda down our throats.
Once authors develop a following, why do some of them feel the need to start using their books as soap boxes at the expense of their characters?
After having said all of the above, I have to add that I haven't read Lee Child's latest book 61 Hours, but probably will.
Everyone,
(apologies for the mass response but I'm at a cafe where they charge an effing forture per minute).
I think my problem with 61 Hours and the other Reacher books is that while Child is a competent writer (and he's clearly intelligent and quite witty) his plots are actually like watching WWF wrestling on the TV - the good guys are very good, the bad guys are very bad, the good guys are going to get a punch up with the bad guys - after a bit of shouting - and then they are going to win. I think the Reacher books are perfect if you're a 17 year old boy, but it's a little surprising to me that they're quite so successful.
Judging by, well, a lot of things, formula has its place, I guess. I guess sometimes we just like to know exactly how it's all going to go.
Someone said to me writing TV is like writing a Haiku.
I guess writing novels can be like that, too.
Whoever said that about TV and haiku was deluding themselves. Probably. If it was a Japanese haiku master, I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.
John
You cant have much fat in a 22 minute sitcom, although you wouldnt know that from watching Dharma and Greg or Mad About You.
Post a Comment