Sunday, July 18, 2010

Gunshot Road

My review of Adrian Hyland's new novel from yesterday's Melbourne Age

Gunshot Road - Adrian Hyland

At its best crime writing is a lens through which we can view society, analysing its flaws and follies while allowing ourselves to relax in a genre that is both familiar and comfortable. Crime fiction has its rules and tropes but colouring within the box of these conventions a skilful writer can take us to places that even literary fiction dare not go. Adrian Hyland is well on the path to becoming such a writer; his second novel, Gunshot Road, the sequel to the Ned Kelly Award winning Diamond Dove is the continuation of the story of Emily Tempest a young, attractive half white, half Aboriginal woman from the desert town of Bluebush in the Northern Territory.
...
At the start of Gunshot Road Tempest is just beginning her first day on the job as an Aboriginal Community Police Officer. Tempest’s boss, the sympathetic Superintendent McGillivray is going to ease her in gently, but he is sucker punched in a brawl and sent to the hospital. In one of the many delicious little ironies in the novel, McGillivray’s bedside reading material is Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee - the story of a once proud aboriginal people marginalised and penned in squalid reservations.
...
Tempest is forced to work with Acting Superintendent Cockburn, a man less in sympathy with the native peoples and their problems. A case of two drunken elderly prospectors - one of whom allegedly killed the other - is Tempest’s first investigation and although it seems like a simple affair to Cockburn she notices inconsistencies and begins – literally - digging deeper. Enter a mysterious Chinese geologist, a pattern of rocks which is really a map and a shaman from the desert who everyone assumed was dead years ago. Mining is an important piece of the puzzle in Gunshot Road and we are treated to a fascinating insight into the geological diversity and richness of the red heart of Australia. But the meat of the book, of course, is Emily herself, a woman of two worlds: contemporary white Australia and an Aboriginal culture that goes back tens of thousands of years.
...
Recent fictional treatments of Aboriginal life by non Aboriginals have seldom been that interesting because they err on the side of caution, often treating the indigenous peoples as if they are living exhibits in a kind of Stone Age spiritual museum. Hyland’s novel however explores some of the problems that others shy away from such as endemic alcoholism, petty violence and spousal abuse. I actually think he could have gone further into this territory without losing the reader: he mentions in passing punitive police raids and jail suicides, but holds back from the full gravity of such experiences, keeping his tone relatively light and chatty. Although this is comparing apples and oranges you are unlikely to put down Gunshot Road seething with anger the way you do with Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee.
...
Tempest uses her local knowledge, her intimate relationship with the land and her deep understanding of human nature to eliminate a few red herrings and make real progress with the case. The further her quest takes her away from the claustrophobic world of the “whitefellas” the better I liked the book. Hyland too seems to relish the harsh bush of secret water holes and mythic landscapes. Here is his description of an incident at a fire ceremony:

I’d thought I was ready for her, a part of me was. But another part was mesmerised, staring with dazzled fascination at the river of light the torch left in its wake. In that shimmering arc I saw galaxies and golden fish, splinters and wings, crystal ships. I saw the song we’d just been singing.

I could have done with more of these scenes that are “very Territory” and are utterly engrossing; in compensation Hyland could perhaps have eased up a little on the broad humour (I certainly hope that he’s got all the Ron Jeremy jokes out of his system now).
...
Before I began Diamond Dove I did wonder if a middle aged white man from the Melbourne suburbs could really get inside the head of a twenty something girl from a splintering Aboriginal mob on the edge of the spinifex bush, but two books in I am reassured. Unless you are very picky indeed your disbelief will not be unsuspended. Experienced crime readers will figure out the mystery a little earlier than Emily Tempest does, but this does not detract from a novel which is rich, lyrical and moving. The Text Publishing Company are offering readers an accountant confounding “love it or your money back” guarantee, but my guess is that this is one of the safer financial gambles that they’ll take all year.

26 comments:

adrian mckinty said...

I read Gunshot Road at the same time as I read The Lamb Enters The Dreaming and the books make a nice complimentary pair. There are no real bad guys in either book. It would be easy to make the "whitefellas" or the miners or the white settlers into the politically correct villains and to have the Aboriginals as some kind of repository of ancient eco goodness or something (like in Avatar) but both books generally avoid the cliches and offer us characters with shades of meaning and complexity.

I think Stieg Larsson is popular because his vision is essentially a very conservative one. The baddies are the ones we expect to be bad, but in Gunshot Road and The Lamb Enters The Dreaming we are in the realm of complex relationships and a much more grown up story telling ethos.

If you can get and read both Gunshot and Lamb at the same time it is a very satisfying experience.

adrian mckinty said...

About that word conservative...

I've never really bought into Michael Moorcock's famous attack on Tolkien and CS Lewis in his essay Epic Pooh for this reason: if Moorcock doesn't like CS Lewis's, AA Milne's or Tolkien's books it shouldnt matter what their political agenda is; are the books well written or poorly written should be his only concern. It's irrelevant whether Tolkien had a misanthropic Conservative vision of mankind or not (actually I think that sounds kind of interesting), it should only matter whether this prejudice or vision clouded his prose and the story and thus ruins the book. I dont think it does with Tolkien because he isn't writing a modern novel. The bad guys can be one dimensional aspects of evil because Tolkien is writing a religious mythological saga disguised as a novel. It does matter with Larsson because in a fiction set in the twenty first century I expect characters who are multi dimensional and who act like real people (unless its an Italo Calvino or Harukami type of thing and you need to be pretty smart to pull that off). If an author of a contemporary thriller or mystery novel condescends to me, the reader, I am very annoyed. What do I mean by condescends? Well, if an Australian appears in a Stieg Larsson novel he lives on a sheep station. Australians only live on sheep stations in children's books and on Skippy the Bush Kangaroo. If a West Indian woman appears in a SL novel she is always large and wise, Russians are fascistic ex KGB, Americans wife beating capitalist pigs etc. In Larsson's bizarre, old fashioned Tin Tin world-view lesbians can be tamed by the right man coming along (an embarrassing avatar of the author), journalists can be put in their place by being told that the stock market is just one big fraud, etc. Much of this makes Larsson's novels unintentionally funny. (Of course Tolkien can be unintentionally funny too.)

I'm not trying to ruin anyone's fun here. People I know and respect (Garbhan Downey for one) like Stieg Larsson and perhaps its overthinking a novel which is just supposed to be a page turner. Fair enough. But I kind of think that SL's only gotten away with it because people consider him to be quaint, cute and quirky - you know, Swedish. If a German, Yank, Brit or Frenchman tried to pull off this talking down to you bullshit they wouldnt last five minutes, but Swedes are the people who give us those nice boxy cars and Abba and that wonderful furniture and you can't dislike them. (At least I cant).

What has this got to do with Gunshot Road?

Nothing friends. Nothing at all.

adrian mckinty said...

oh and here's my link to The Lamb Enters The Dreaming and this is its Amazon.com listing:

http://www.amazon.com/Lamb-Enters-Dreaming-Nathanael-Ruptured/dp/1921640472/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1279378082&sr=8-1


Adrian Hyland's books can be got just about everywhere.

Brian O'Rourke said...

Nice review, mate, and I made sure to do my civic/literary duty by voting for you on NPR. Hope all is well, brother.

Adrian said...

Brian

Thanks for that and I hope that all is well with you too what with a new kid and all...

seana said...

Very interesting review and, uh, footnotes.Peter R. has had some nice things to say about these books as well, and yes, they are easily available here from Soho Press, which I think does a great line of crime novels. I'll have to get to these.

As to Tolkien, though, I'm kind of surprised that a religious mythological saga would have had enduring appeal to you. Not to anyone but to you in particular. Doesn't seem like quite your world view.

I decided today that I should just consent to take people's money for the Larsson books and stop trying to convince them that they aren't as good as they should be. I wouldn't really mind if they would also branch out a little. Some do, but it's an uphill battle.

adrian said...

Seana

Criticising Tolkien for thin characters and an old fashioned attitude is like shooting fish in a barrel. Its like criticising Beowulf. Tolkien didnt set out to write a contemporary novel. That wasnt his agenda at all. Moorcock's famous attack has always struck me as being rather silly.

I think the Larsson books are overrated but people buying them doesnt drive me mental or anything. People buying Dan Brown doesnt drive me crazy either. Frankly I'm happy that people buy any books at all. Yes there are better novels that the Millennium trilogy but there are worse ones too.

seana said...

No, I got your point about Moorcock failing to get his intent, though I haven't actually read the Moorcook piece. I'm just saying that the Inklings wouldn't really have seemed to be your type of club.

It doesn't depress me that Larsson's books sell either, though it does get a bit tedious when everyone only wants to talk about that one series all the time. The narrowing of people's awareness of what's even out there beyond the blockbusters does depress me at times, though.

Glenna said...

The narrowing of people's awareness of what's even out there beyond the blockbusters..

And that would be why I'm here, well, part of it anyway.

Adrian,
Does Moonlight Downs need to be read first, or will Gunshot Road pretty much make sense on it's own? I have a friend in Australia that's probably going to bring me The Lamb Enters the Dreaming when she comes for a visit which sounds like it'll work in well with these.

Adrian said...

Seana

Did you ever see Shadowlands? That Inklings club looked like fun. Nice beer, nice rooms, an easy life and a young Deborah Winger throwing herself at you.

Adrian said...

Glenna

You can definitely read it as a Standalone and I think that reading it with Lamb will be a great experience.

seana said...

I didn't, but I'll see if it's on Netflix. Sounds fun. It's always fun to think about groups of writers or artists who congregated in some way and ended up turning out significant work on the whole. I don't know if the internet works the same way, but it might. The food and drink wouldn't be as good, though.

kathy d. said...

On Stieg Larsson--he's no John Steinbeck or Toni Morrison. He writes a good page-turner, gripping story, interesting characters, and paints in broad strokes with a large story. And, for me, and a lot of women readers--great women characters, especially in Book III. And Salander is a fighter; she doesn't retreat into catatonia which others with her experiences might do.

On the issue of "political correctness," or not, some readers, including me, can't read anything that is in itself presenting a very conservative or bigoted viewpoint. It ruins the book. Not that there aren't some awful characters who say awful things, but what is the author's point of view overall? What is he or she saying?

I won't read C.S. Lewis' writings after reading in the NYTBR about his racism and anti-Semitism. It's ruined for me. I have no interest in reading this. Words would give me a headache or get caught in my throat if I had to read it out loud. Reading shouldn't be punitive or forced on one.

In "Truth," Villani, who is flawed in many ways, is principled. He opposes bigotry, clearly. He also did in "The Broken Shore."

The basic thing is individual taste in reading as in all things. The most important thing about a book is that it's enjoyable to the reader or why bother. If it's offensive, then it's not enjoyable. There's so much to read and so little time, as the saying goes, so why not read what one likes to read for entertainment, for learning, for joy?

kathy d. said...

By the way, I very much enjoyed your review of "Gunshot Road," which I just started. I liked Hyland's first book in this series a lot.

Adrian said...

Kathy

I'd go along with that. Why slave through something which is annoying the hell out of you. Life is too short.

Dr Johnson said that you should just read exactly what you please and to hell with everyone else.

Although Kafka said that we should read books that hurt us and challenge us.

Both, of course, are right.

kathy d. said...

Challenge yes. Hurt--I don't know. It is somewhat hurtful already, as a woman, to read about the horrific hostility and violence against women in many books, as in the Larsson trilogy. One has to be able to put up with it, although one can cringe while reading it or skip some of it, as many of my women friends do, and I did.
Or even to read bigoted and sexist language, as, for instance, use of certain words in "Truth," a very good book (and there's a reason for the language), but it still can cause a reaction for the reader.
People have different tolerances for this sort of thing or different standards of what they will read.
But sometimes this is hurtful for a reader already.
And there's lots of it out there in society and on the street. And sometimes one wants books to be pure escapism without all of that baggage. So, people want different things in books; some are willing to overlook what others can't. Or don't want to.
We all bring different experiences to the table.

Adrian said...

Kathy

Yeah my rule of thumb is usually about page 40. If I hate it still by page 40 I stop reading. (Unless I have to review it for the paper).

You wouldnt know it to look at me but I'm pretty squeamish too. I've never used the N word in any of my books, just never felt that it was ever necessary.

I've also never written about the rape, murder or torture of children. For me that's a bridge too far. I dont know why anyone would want to read that stuff and I certainly wouldnt want to write about it.

My problem with Larsson (among other things) is that he has his cake and eats it too. He condemns violence against women, but gives us pages and pages and pages of it in loving detail.

Salinder's feminist cred vanished for me when she had sex with the author's creepy avatar and then got breast implants. Ugh.

kathy d. said...

Avatar? Salander's feminist credentials are redeemed, I think, in Book I when she takes revenge against her custodian who brutally raped her. A lot of women readers stood up for her on this.
Look, she's brilliant, a genius (look at the financial scam she carried out, her hacking ability), independent and a fighter. (I'll forgive her the plastic surgery for fighting back.)
Yes, Larsson could have written less violence against women (as I said, I skipped much of it) but then would Salander's rage have made sense? That there were no agencies or groups for her to turn to bothered me a great deal.
Also, I am squeamish about violence, true, but I also get offended by racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, anti-Irish (have both ancestries), anti-immigrant, anti-gay language and attitudes. That stuff makes me cringe and occasionally yell at the writer.
But the violence against women gets to me viscerally, as to many women who won't read any books which include this. Some women reviewers won't review books with brutal violence against women on book covers (which publishers want done, even if the victim is a man or child).
Things are offensive to people; words do hurt. I'm for challenges and learning--and enjoyment! Not self-torture while reading.
Anyway, speaking of enjoyment, stayed up to read "Gunshot Road," which has made me laugh frequently (Christopher Hitchens; Doc, Darwin, etc.) put a smile on my face
often and made me not want to leave certain pages or characters.
I hope it gets lots of prizes.

Adrian said...

Kathy

To me S Larsson feels like one of those creepy college professors who pretend to be all liberal and feminist and say all the right things but underneath they are lecherous old pervs.

I found it strange that Salander's a lesbian only until Blomkvist comes along (the avatar of Larsson I was thinking of) and then he "cures her" with his creepy patter and then she gets breast implants for him and...ugh. If this is what passes for feminist icons these days we really are up shit creek as a culture.

And she doesnt kill the guardian ultimately does she? Someone else does. Cop out I felt. Larsson never never allows her to kill anyone in cold blood only in self defence (at least in books 1 and 2).

Yes they're only page turners but I find Larsson motive's questionable. I dont think his heart is in the right place. And I think there is some evidence (his womanising, how he treated his partner etc.) that I may be right about this.

KATHY D. said...

I'm leaving Stieg Larsson for now because I am joyfully reading "Gunshot Road," and savoring every paragraph.

Hyland obviously wrote each sentence with care and carefully crafted each paragraph.

So, I for one, who usually tries to zip through mysteries, is reading slowly, thinking and savoring it all, while smiling and at times, laughing.

Why can't every writer do this? Then mystery fiction would be better and so would literary fiction, which I consider this to be. It transcends the mystery genre, although that often does happen.
(Only suggestion: I could use a glossary.)

Adrian said...

Kathy

There's a good reason for that. Editors are constantly being told by their marketing people that the words in a story dont matter. Its all about characters, a couple of plot twists, and series, always make sure its a series. James Patterson has published 6 novels in the last year and everyone of them has been a bestseller. Why should care about the words.

I do. You do. But very few others alas.

kathy d. said...

Well, there is a time and place for a good thriller; staying up all night with a page-turner is fun.

But now publishers also want international thrillers with fighting, wars, espionage, etc., none of which does anything for me.

But good writing--yes. Also, need that.

"Gunshot Road" is not only good writing but it makes one think. The philosophers, writers, science, including evolution being included in the story are just great, in addition to the sense of place in Australia, like a good novel can do.

Anonymous said...

Hi Adrian (weird name) - thanks for the thoughtful review.

Do enjoy your books and blog. Like to catch up for a drink some time?

Cheers

Adrian Mk II

Adrian said...

Adrian

Glad you liked it. I thought you'd take the huff at my Ron Jeremy remark but evidently not.

Yeah give me your email, or if you fear to do so in a public forum such as this (although really who's paying attention way down there) you can get mine from Jason Steger at The Age.

kathy d. said...

"Gunshot Road" is so riveting and interesting that I get caught up in the descriptions, dialogues and people and keep forgetting that it's a mystery.

And I've been hooked on going to google to look up geography, terrain, weather of the area Hyland is discussing.

Anonymous said...

Nah, don't even know what a huff is.

I'm at:

a.hyland@latrobe.edu.au

Live in the bush, but come down to the big smoke every week or so, and would (hopefully) enjoy meeting you (if for no other reason than to find out why anybody would leave Ireland to live in Melbourne).

Adrian