Friday, February 24, 2012

Death Comes To Pemberley

If anyone else but PD James had written Death Comes To Pemberley hopefully it would have receieved the same criticial opprobrium lavished upon Pride & Prejudice & Zombies or other Jane Austen knock offs. The book takes place several years after the conclusion of Pride and Prejudice. George Wickham - Mr Darcy's brother in law - is accused of having murdered his best friend in the Pemberley woods. He is found crouched over the body and crying that he is responsible. Anyone who has read more than one other mystery novel will deduce that he is not guilty and although the real suspect my come as a surprise by the time the resolution announces its presence and then beats you over the head you won't much care who done it or why.
...
Pemberley is not a good book. It is extremely slow and much of the novel takes place in drawing rooms where various characters recount what they have seen. Often these recitations are repeated three or even four times in different contexts. Bizarrely the novel reminded me of Star Wars: The Phantom Menace where much of the movie was taken up with dreary exposition and scene after scene of two shots on sofas. With Jane Austen's extraordinarily rich cast of characters PD James has produced a narrative where they are neither troubled too much or required to think too hard. Indeed they are so lifeless and tedious that I wondered from time to time if I wasn't reading the zombie book after all.  
...
The biggest crime of all in Pemberley is not the alleged murder but the fact that Elizabeth Bennet/Elizabeth Darcy is missing for much of the novel and has almost nothing to do. Her intelligence and wit are never shown and she is excluded completely from the Old Bailey where we might have benefited from her insights. There is a rather sly reference to Emma near the end of the book and this would be have been an ideal place for Elizabeth to do something clever but alas she once again is only a passive observer of events that others have undertaken. That one of the great characters of nineteenth century literature should be so treated is actually quite shocking. Elizabeth Bennet is a lot of things but this is the first time that someone has contrived to make her boring. 
...
Death Comes To Pemberley has become a best seller and the film rights have been optioned. This is no surprise: our culture has largely lost its critical facility especially when it comes to crime fiction. Benjamin Black gets serialised in the New Yorker, The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo sells twenty million copies. Hype triumphs and we are offered the work of the connected, the safe and the dull. It was not always thus but it is now.   

38 comments:

seana said...

I did end up buying a copy that my bookstore friends set aside for me, so I'll have to catch up with your thoughts on this one when I'm done.

adrian mckinty said...

Seana

Feel free to completely disagree as usual.

seana said...

I'm just going to say in advance that I'm going to bet it was the idea of writing about Pemberly that drew her write this, not the love story.

adrian mckinty said...

Seana

For me it would have been the chance to have fun with the great Elizabeth Bennet but PD James seems to have thought Mr Darcy was the more interesting of the two. And even he gets short shrift.

seana said...

Well, women do find Darcy interesting. I'm sure it made Colin Firth's fortune.

I got in a lot of trouble at my book group the other night for daring to suggest that Parrot and Olivier in America was a bit of a slog. As I'd only managed half of it, I didn't have much ground to stand on. More than the people who hadn't managed to open it at all, though.

adrian mckinty said...

Seana

If you'll recall six months ago I said of that book "we have to get through a lot of Parrot and Olivier before we get to America."

Peter Carey is overrated. And annoying. He went to the most expensive private school in Australia and presents himself as some kind of blue collar man of the people. I can't stand that stuff.

seana said...

Actually, you only said it a couple of weeks ago.

I have liked Carey in the past--I really liked Jack Maggs and I really liked The True Adventures of the Ned Kelly Gang. But I think this book points out his weaknesses. He has some very felicitous sentences, and I suppose if I hadn't been under the infernal reading group sort of deadline I wouldn't have minded taking a very leisurely pace with this, but 200 pages in, you really should have some vague sense of where the author is going or what he or she is trying to do.

One of my old bookshop friends once went to a signing with the guy and he was incredibly rude to her. I kind of wrote it off to the fact that she is a bit highly strung herself, but maybe I shouldn't be so generous toward him, as she was a true fan.

It's true that you should never meet your idols.

Cary Watson said...

There are already lots of mysteries set on Planet Austen, so what compelled James to take a crack at it? It's not like James is a Pattersonian moneygrubber so it all seems a bit unfathomable. She should have done a Vanity Fair mystery; that's virgin ground and Becky Sharp would make an interesting detective.

seana said...

This is where I seem to take issue with everyone, Cary. Regardless of the outcome, there is surely no reason why she shouldn't have taken a stab at this one. She is 92years old, and admired by a large swathe of the reading world. She can do whatever the hell she wants, and her fans will be grateful, even if this is, as Adrian thinks, a lesser effort.

adrian mckinty said...

Seana

A Geelong Grammar School boy acting like a rude, entitled asshole? What a surprise.

adrian mckinty said...

Cary

Yeah. I admire the fact that she's still firing on all cylinders at 92. If I could be half as coherent and together at that age I'd be pleased and although I am an admirer of the James oeuvre there really was no need for this.

seana said...

There is little need for the stuff most anyone writes, though, is there? I know you all think I'm leveling my criticism at you, but I have heard this disdain for James trying this elsewhere, and even from initial reading it's not like she's floundering around and past it. Everyone was happy to hear about Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, no one complains about another remake of Pride and Prejudice or any of the novels as a movie, but if someone who has clearly mastered her craft wants to do her take on it, she should just give it a rest. Like I say, I don't know yet if she succeeded and I am kind of assuming not, but I do think it was an interesting idea, and you aren't going to convince me that she shouldn't have given it a go if she wanted to.

I don't need more Becky Sharp, by the way.

Glenna said...

I typically don't read Austen "sequels" but found myself caving on this one. I won't make that mistake again. This being the first James novel I've read, I'm glad to hear it's not typical. I'll give her another try.

adrian mckinty said...

Seana

I thought the new remake of P&P was completely unncessary. But yes good for PDJ. She can do whatever she likes. She's earned it.

But its not fair on readers to give her a pass because of her past successes and who she is.

adrian mckinty said...

Glenna

they most certainly are not all like this.

Try Children of Men thats my favourite.

seana said...

Although I reserve the book for itself, the "pass" part is true. But it is the current state of publishing, isn't it? Below a certain threshold of success, you can't get your book published, above it, no one dares to tell you that your manuscript has problems. I thought that about the Carey book too, and we can all think of our own examples.

It's funny, because really the most valuable gift a writer can have is a great editor. That should be the reward for achievement, not it's reverse.

seana said...

Glenna, I got sucked in by The Dark Tower, but I think my favorite was another stand alone, Innocent Blood. I didn't read Children of Men, but it is not in her usual sphere, judging from the movie--which was good.

I also liked her one 'true crime' tale, The Maul and the Pear Tree. And believe me, I am not normally a true crime fan.

Michelle said...

Your critique of Death Comes To Pemberley is dead on. So many missed opportunities. So predictable, so boring. But, she definitely ran out of interesting ideas with the introduction. Maybe her agent made her do it?

adrian mckinty said...

Seana

A good editor would have been very helpful with P.

adrian mckinty said...

Michelle


Missed opportunities is right. Esp with Elizabeth Bennet. What a waste.

seana said...

I've started it and what I can say right away is that it will be a great hit with fans of Downton Abbey.

Peter Rozovsky said...

Benjamin Black was serialized in the New York Times; I don’t know if he made it to the New Yorker as well. But you're right. Off the one Quirke novel I’ve read, he’s a gifted prose stylist who has not proven he can write competent crime fiction.
================================
Detectives Beyond Borders
"Because Murder Is More Fun Away From Home"
http://www.detectivesbeyondborders.blogspot.com/

Peter Rozovsky said...

What do these periodic Jane Austen manias say about our culture? I love Jane Austen, have read Pride and Prejudice, Sense and Sensibility, and Emma several times each, but I have no interest in the updates, rip-offs, and pastiches. The opening sentence of the P.D. James’ book is an amusing reference to P&P’s opening line, but I’m not sure I need a few hundred pages of that sort of thing. I think I’ll read The Children of Men instead.

Interesting that male infertility is the cause of the end of human reproduction in the novel, but the movie switches the cause to female infertility.
================================
Detectives Beyond Borders
"Because Murder Is More Fun Away From Home"
http://www.detectivesbeyondborders.blogspot.com/

Macca said...

Good to see you a swipe at B.Black.

Those novels in themselves are not much good, but, on top of that, I just loathe all that crap that Banville goes on with when he talks about them.

Making out that he "channels" Black, that he doesn't know where the stuff comes from and all that malarkey, as though his own highly refined mind couldn't possibly soil itself by getting involved with a lowbrow form of writing like crime fiction. What a wanker.

adrian mckinty said...

Peter

The NYT eh? They publish his woolly editorials as well. He's a sorry excuse for an Irish intellectual. And his crime fiction is feeble to say the least.

adrian mckinty said...

Macca

Yeah he is a bit of a wanker. And as is the way with wankers the more confident he's become in his abilities the more wankerish he has become. His books have gotten worse too. I suppose he peaked in the early 80's and for the last 30 years has been toiling over ever diminishing returns. The Booker Prize delighted him to an obscene degree but it was definitely a lifetime achievement award rather than a reflection on his novel The Sea.

seana said...

So you read The Sea?

I actually have mixed feelings about the guy, but The Sea was not great.

Peter Rozovsky said...

Here's my review of Black/Banville’s A Death in Summer, for those of you who have forgotten it already. See how many names of Irish and other crime writers you can find in it!!!
=======================================
Detectives Beyond Borders
"Because Murder Is More Fun Away From Home"
http://www.detectivesbeyondborders.blogspot.com/

adrian mckinty said...

seana

no it was shite.

adrian mckinty said...

Peter

Dec Burke and Dave Torrans tell me that he's a great guy, but my experience is that he's a tosser with a Napoleon complex.

Peter Rozovsky said...

My newspaper's former book editor also says Banville is a good guy with a sense of humor, and Declan Burke is the first person who ever made me suspect that he (Banville) might not be a complete jerk.

So I tried to ignore the provocative statements and to judge A Death in Summer by Banville/Black's own terms. If literature is an art but crime fiction a craft, did his crime novel meet the standards of competent craftsmanship? It did not. He says he wants to avoid cliches. Does he do so? Certainly not. So I don't think of him as a jerk but rather as a mediocre crime novelist.
======================
Detectives Beyond Borders
"Because Murder Is More Fun Away From Home"
http://www.detectivesbeyondborders.blogspot.com/

seana said...

I think he probably does have a sense of humor, but he doesn't think we'll get it.

He actually talks about the aesthetics of writing his non crime fiction as though he were a craftsman, very painstaking, so I'm sure that's where the divide on craft is.

I haven't read any of the crime novels, well, I started one, but I have read several of the others. Not crazy about the later works, though I did find Kepler lively.

Peter Rozovsky said...

Seana, I think he made the craft/literature distinction himself. You should be able check easily enough. I think he made it in his interview with Declan Burke in Down These Green Streets.

seana said...

No, I remember him talking about how carefully he crafted his sentences in somewhere like the Paris Review--I remember it because it tired me out. I'm getting less and less interested in people talking about their process.

Peter Rozovsky said...

Well, he is notorious in crime circles for saying something like he can sweat all day to produce a hundred words as Banville turn out effortless thousands as Black.

seana said...

Right, but I think that's probably a mind game he's playing with himself.

Peter Rozovsky said...

Or with s, by making sure we know about the game.

seana said...

I don't know if anyone is still reading down here, but I thought I'd just keep my comment with the post.

I read this on a brief trip to L.A..While I found it strangely comforting to have it on a journey that contained some flight cancellations and further delays, and never thought I wouldn't finish it, it is as you who've read it all say--a bad book. Endless recounting of things we already know, and a general lack of mirth, but what I think is it's biggest sin is that it takes the idea of life in Pemberly, which stands for every kind of imaginative, creative happy ending, and turns it into a bore. In this version, Elizabeth would have been better off marrying Wickham, and that's saying a lot.

The missing wit, however, can be found here.