Monday, October 22, 2012
A Booker Winner I Can Get Behind
Like the Oscar for Best Picture the Booker Prize winning novel is usually very bad. Some years the prize is given to an old stager who has hung around literary London for so long that it's gotten embarrassing that he hasn't won anything. Some years it's given to an exotic foreigner (usually an Indian) as a way of spiking the jealousy of the Hampstead/Islington set. Some years it's given to a novel which is so dense that none of the judges actually finish it and because of that they assume that it's really clever or something. The Booker Prize nomination and judging process is so arcane, incestuous and random that the prize itself is no guarantee of quality. In fact a few of the worst books I've ever read have been Booker Prize winners (The Finkler Question, John Banville's The Sea etc.) But occasionally - very occasionally - a fluke happens and the Booker judges pick a really good book as deserving of the prize: Midnight's Children, The Ghost Road, The Siege of Krishnapur and a few others. . . And this year they also managed to pick one of my recent favourites: Bring Up The Bodies, Hilary Mantel's sequel to Wolf Hall. Bring Up The Bodies is the second volume of Mantel's brilliant rehabilitation of the reputation and career of Henry VIII's courtier Thomas Cromwell. It reads like a revenge thriller as Cromwell takes down the awful Boleyn family and the men who made mock of his beloved patron, Cardinal Wolsey. Bodies is shorter than Wolf Hall, snappier, a little bit funnier and more exciting. It is paced perfectly and once you get by Mantel's faux sixteenth century prose you'll watch those pages turn in a blur...You can read my original rave review of Wolf Hall and Bring Up The Bodies, here. Yes, when I gush, I gush. . .
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

40 comments:
Adrian, your man Howard Jacobson is coming to the Free Library of Philadelphia this week. I wonder if that's a bit of savvy programming. I once said to a co-religionist at one of the library readings that they invigorated me because the last time I'd been around so many Jews older than I was was at my bar mitzvah.
My CAPTCHA word on this comment is delightfully self-referential: cnntsee
Well, that's what I thought it was.
Peter
Did you catch The Thick Of It this week? I'm afraid they've all caught Veepitis or something. Pretty feeble stuff.
Now I'll have to give this a read :) thanks!
I tried The Finkler Question, but didn't finish it. It was boring.
My choice of the best book on the Booker list is Remains of the Day.
I'm quite tempted by the Mantel book.
Adrian, did you know that your children are directly descended from Thomas and Oliver Cromwell? Never got me a free drink in London, though...
John
I didn't read any of them, but I read a review of Wolf Hall by Christopher Hitchens and he made it sound amazing. Sure thing if both novels in the series won the same price, I'm sure it was something special.
Cinabear
I warn you, its not everyone. Try the first 10 pages first...But saying that I LOVED it.
Speedskater
I have an especial hate for the Finkler Question because I was trapped in a 10 hour flight with only that book for company. I loathed it from start to finish. An unfunny embarrassment to Jewish comedy and literature. So boring and such small portions...
John
I think thats pretty cool. I dont know about Oliver but Thomas and his family have successfully been rehabilitated for me by Ms Mantel.
Ben
Hitch gushed too didnt he? He loved Wolf Hall, its a real shame he didnt live long enough to read Bodies even in galley.
Annie Hall
Speedskater
I wondered if anyone would spot that.
People should read Wolf Hall first though. And as I recall you didn't like it the first time you started it. Oddly, that seems to be a common experience. So I'd say, start the book, and you don't like it, put it down and try it sometime later.
I knew I would like Wolf Hall immediately, but for some reason I also put it down and it was awhile before I got to it.
Adrian, I thought this week's The Thick of It was pretty good, especially considering its setting entirely in a committee room.
Veep did come to mind, though, during an annoying Hulu ad for Chicago Hope that showed the doctors striding toward the camera in lockstep clearly meant to indicate determination. It was the same cliched camera set-up that made me turn off the first episode of Veep and not go back.
CAPTCHA word: federale
Adrian, Peter - The Thick of It was SO feeble this week that I did 5 sudoku puzzles and then nodded off... Leveson was much more entertaining..
Seana
Thats an excellent point. I remember really being put off by the prose and the nihilistic violence of that opening act of Wolf Hall. I set it aside for a LONG time. But when I back to it none of that mattered at all and I read the thing, devoured it more like, in 3 days.
Peter, Deb
I'm with Deb on this one. I thought the actual Leveson inquiry was much more interesting. I think The Thick Of It has tarnished its legacy a bit with this series I'm afraid. And my God Hulu is horrible...
No doubt I could be missing something because I didn't following the Leveson inquiry. A feeble imitation of the original could be wince-making, all right.
A shame if this season spoils TTOI's legacy for you, since I read this will almost surely be hte final season.
Peter
Tarnished not spoiled. I just dont think its quite up there with its own high standards...
speedy work from wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tour_de_france_winners
Seana, Adrian - that has been my experience with Wolf Hall - I started it AGES and AGES ago, and have put it aside, I am yet to pick it up again... Strange, as I am happy to read all sorts of historical fiction/ faction/ biography. AND history is my business, or rather the material culture bit of history aka dead people's rubbish - or even bits of dead people (archaeology) or mementos (social history), all catalogued, stored in boxes in the museum store, and then displayed in exhibitions and galleries. I have another holiday coming up, so will read Wolf Hall and this latest book in one hit.
I think many people are initially put off by the voice. I'm on some kind of thread about it at Goodreads and a lot of people hate it. They can't tell the characters apart and so on. I never found this to be a problem, but I can understand it.
I am a little surprised that the violence put you off, Adrian. I remember it being along the lines of life being nasty, brutish and short and more just to show her idea of what had formed him.
I had to read both The Sea and The Finkler Question for my book group. I didn't mind Finkler, but didn't love it. I really didn't like The Sea, but I haven't liked anything of Banville's since his early book on Kepler.
Adrian, though I like the current season of TTOI better than you and Deb do, I will concede that the most recent episode show worrying signs of seriousness, a defect that comic artists sometimes fall prey to when they want to be taken seriously.
The first signs of that in TTOI were the cracks in Malcolm's facade when he was being forced out in a previous series.
OH, geez, of course I read the inquiry's more sensaitonal revelations, but I didn't follow its proceedings closely.
Adrian, the Guardian apparently sums up each episode of The Thick of It -- nice, since the Guardian itself was a target this week. The commenters’ take, and even the Guardian writer’s take, are closer to my opinion than to yours, but the Guardian’s writer has a tin ear for humor. The lines singled out as the episode’s funniest were at best. and in just one or two cases, mildly amusing. Fortunately the commenters did pick up on some of the funny lines that the writer missed.
Massive choke by the Cardinals about to be finalized. Giants 9, Cardinals 0 after 8 innings of Game 7. Has any majopr league team come up so small in the clutch since last week?
Peter
I'm pleased. An exhausted Giants will hopefully lose games 1 and 2 to the Tigers. Detroit were smart. They traded all their shitty players to the Yankees and took all the young talent.
I'm not a baseball watcher, but I am surrounded by Giants fans here, and they would say you will be proved wrong about their exhaustion.
Me, I've been watching the debates, which was a lot funner.
You were big-upping Curtis Granderson last year, as I recall.
I don't dislike the Giants, but I'll root for the Tigers, too. With Verlander going so well, they'll be favored.
Peter
The, er, Grandy Man, can't. At least not in the post season.
Seana
I'll root for the Giants when they move back to New York.
I had a long talk the other night with some of my baseball loving friends about this whole thing of the transient nature of teams. First of all, they pointed out that free agency was a good thing for the players. But they took my point about why fans care when players don't, exactly. What exactly are the fans rooting for? I know we've talked about here, but I finally got it when I realized that it's the same thing as why people feel loyal to their alma mater. Most people don't stay at a college more than four years, but that doesn't mean that there nostalgic connection to whatever the idea of their college is diminishes.
But your point that the Giants moved expresses some of the contradictions of all such allegiances.
Adrian, don't worry about the Yankees. They've got A-Rod locked up through the end of the Putin administration. They'll be fine.
Seana
I have a little bit of the opposite thing going on sometimes. I always cheer against Oxford University, I dislike the Denver Broncos (I even hate them more than The Dallas Cowboys and thats saying something) and I will not support any team from Boston under any circumstances.
Peter
I imagine in 2017 Hank or Hal Steinbrenner will make ARod player manager as reward for his services.
Nah, he'll be a special consultant, like Reggie Jackson.
I have a bit of contrarian blood as well, which I'm pretty sure will come as a complete surprise to you.
It's not easy when you're in retail and should theoretically agree with everything everyone says. Especially at the cash register.
No luck finding an ebook copy of Falling Glass in the USA. Any thoughts?
Not that I should really be helping Amazon,Anonymous, but if you go to their webpage you can click on that button requesting that the publisher offer an ebook. Since Serpent's tale already offers an ebook in England, it shouldn't be that hard for them to do here.
I'm reading Wolf Hall, and I am more favorably disposed than you were toward the opening scene's violence. You were right about the final season of The Thick of It, though, but I'm not sure its defects have to do with any resemblance to zVeep.
Post a Comment