Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Ronan Bennett

I just watched Michael Mann's Public Enemies starring Johnny Depp and scripted by Ronan Bennett. I liked the movie, I don't think its Mann on top form but it isn't terrible. Anyway it gives me a chance to republish this review of Bennett's Havoc In Its Third Year from a couple of years ago:
...
Ronan Bennett’s HAVOC, IN ITS THIRD YEAR is set in the north of England in the 1630s. It is the story of John Brigge, a respectable county civil servant who is also a covert follower of the “old religion”. Brigge is the parish coroner, and the book begins with his investigation into a local woman who appears to have murdered her baby. There may be more to the story than meets the eye or it could be that Brigge’s compassion towards the desperate wretches that appear before him day-in and day-out has clouded his judgement. In either case, Brigge raises suspicions among some of the local townsfolk and his life, complicated already by his own wife’s pregnancy, takes a dramatic turn for the worse.
...
Bennett skilfully portrays a man on the edge and a country at the cusp of a disastrous civil war; among many remarkable passages he gives us Brigge’s dreams that mix murderers, wives, victims, secret priests and unborn children in a swirling whirlpool of guilt and fear. Brigge is ultimately betrayed as a Catholic by a jealous clerk and he and his family go on the run through a nightmare landscape no less vivid than the dreamscape.
...
Ronan Bennett and I were born only a few miles and a few years apart but we’re from different cultural and political universes. Bennett was radicalised in the early seventies and apparently he has lost none of his righteous indignation. He has got himself into passionate debates with Martin Amis and Christopher Hitchens and he has said unfortunate things about the Omagh bombing - things which he has since recanted. But surely no one can fault Bennett’s fury at our contemporary scene, and his prose tells us something about the writer behind the disputes: clinical, dispassionate, ironic, intelligent, careful and ultimately incendiary. His plots move, his writing pulses, and his characters live and breathe and disagree with each other and often him. He takes his time with his protagonists, allowing them psychological and spiritual depth and yet he understands that characters alone aren’t enough; for a book to succeed it must have a strong, well planned narrative. Bennett’s novels are structurally sound and that hardest of combinations: unpredictable, yet completely convincing.
...
Bennett is a profound writer in the tradition of early Le Carré or middle period Greene. He takes his job seriously and never underestimates the intelligence of his readers. And, speaking of Greene occasionally the British press will play the perennially popular game of wondering who “the new Graham Greene” could possibly be. A few – almost always English – authors are often tossed out and then summarily critiqued and dismissed as mere pretenders. No dauphin has yet been found, but if Ronan Bennett keeps on going the way he’s been going, I’d say the contest is over, the new Graham Greene isn’t an Englishman at all – he’s a fearless, gifted, Irishman from Newtownabbey

13 comments:

seana said...

Nice review--I'm pretty sure I didn't see it the first time around.

I remember when Havoc came out here and several of my friends and co-workers got really into it. I didn't get around to it, but I may have picked up a copy somewhere along the way.

I hope so because we don't have it on the shelves there at this point.

That's too bad that he got on the wrong side of Omagh.

adrian mckinty said...

Seana

Its a terrific book. I can imagine people either really liking it or really hating it. Seems to generate the same passion that The 1000 Autumns of Jacob de Zoet generates. I really liked both of course.

Yeah I cant actually remember what he did say, but I just recall that it was something rather silly.

adrian mckinty said...

Seana,

Incidentally we found that William Vollman piece in Harpers you were talking about and my wife is going to teach it in her course on Race and Class in American Literature.

seana said...

Yes, the people who liked the book were big David Mitchell fans as well. I'm always behind the curve on this kind of thing.

That's really great that your wife is going to include the article in her course. I wonder how it will play in Australia. I have to say that it was very interesting to be reading it in the off moment at work and kind of observe my own reactions to the various homeless people who wandered through. I think of myself as on the tolerant end of the spectrum, even among members of the staff, but in light of Vollman's willingness to involve himself, I found my own response rather lacking.

One of the people I link to on Good Reads happened to post a fairly long complimentary comment on Vollman's book Poor People, which she thinks everyone should read. I plan to try, but like much of Vollman, it's pretty long.

Nigel martin said...

Adrian

I've read quite a few of Bennett's novels but never before spotted a Graham Greene connection, but I see what you mean now. We read The Power and the Glory for O level - not the best place to start on Greene - but then came LC and so on.

However, if you are a Greene and film fan, keep an eye out for the new re-make of Brighton Rock set in the 1960's. Saw a trailer at QFT on Sunday afternoon and it looks amazing, if rather Quadrophenian. ps I really recommend Of Gods and Men - a small French Cistercian community living alongside Muslim neighbours when fundamentalism kicks off.

The new QFT is great by the way. Dunno if you've been lately. My 3 kids are just getting to the stage when we're starting to actually go out again to the cinema!

Enjoyed the recent posts on Oscar and bookshops - good to see No Alibis get a mention. I went to see John Banville launch Elegy for April there and he was fantastic - David just plied him with the red stuff and off he went..brilliant night. Must apologise, I'm probably making you homesick.

Good Luck Nigel

seana said...

I would like to hear John Banville when plied with wine. I expect it would help.

adrian mckinty said...

Nigel

I was supposed to do a reading with Banville once but he adamantly refused to share the stage with a "mystery novelist" so the thing quickly fell apart.

I soured on the chap somewhat after that.

seana said...

Sorry if he's your fave, Nigel, but Banville seems a somewhat conceited individual. I've read a few things, including The Sea, but despite his clean prose, I find him unmemorable.

Nigel Martin said...

Adrian, Seana

I was surprised to find Banville so at ease and amusing. I had heard and read about how prickly he can be. But as you know Adrian, David Torrance is a fine host.

Frankly, I read 50 pages of the Sea and gave up, Seana. I'm not a fan at all, but he's a great stylist. However, I do like him as Benjamin Black - his evocation of1950's Dublin is hard to match.

I'm surprised he refused to share the stage with you Adrian, given his Black alter-ego. The night he did the book launch he spoke at length about his longstanding passion for European detective fiction, especially Simenon.

adrian mckinty said...

Nigel

Yeah as an influence Simenon is conveniently dead and French.

At the event he did with me (or rather before me as he left as soon as it was my turn) he talked about how easy it is to write detective fiction as John Banville - he can knock a Black book out in six weeks he said (another affinity he has with Simenon) - whereas a John Banville novel he said takes him years and years.

Nigel said...

Adrian

It's embarrassing, frankly, for someone with his sort of reputation as "a great man of Irish letters" to behave like that towards anyone, let alone a fellow-writer.

Nigel

adrian mckinty said...

Nigel

Yes embarrassing is the right word. The owner of the shop was mortified and looked like he wanted to hang himself. This was in Arizona, we were quite far from home, so perhaps Banville allowed himself a little more leeway in his behaviour. I really don't know. It was odd.

The rather elderly crowd loved him though it should be said. He told them he wrote much of the book at a friend's "palatial villa in Tuscany" and that "he had shown the manuscript to good friends such as Brian de Palma and Neil Jordan and they had thought it was a masterpiece of the genre". He name dropped a few other famous people and places. They lapped that up.

seana said...

Yeah, I wouldn't have finished The Sea if it hadn't been for a reading group. I did like his early book about Kepler, but he does take his own writing very seriously--I think the review I read was in the Paris Review, if I remember right.

He probably does write the Benjamin Black quickly--that might just be because they have more energy propelling him along. I thought The Sea, which even now I remember little of, was a lot like some of those indie movies which I used to go to a lot. Kid coming of age, facing the world as it 'really is' in some previously unsuspected way--they are all very similar.