![]() |
| Put down the binocs, Grace Kelly's standing behind you |
...
Anyway this isn't a post about the Sight and Sound poll which can be checked out here, no, this is a post about Vertigo. I've never liked Vertigo. Before this week I'd only seen it once and found it flat, dull and uninspiring. The greatest film of all time? I don't think it would make my list as one of the top 5 Alfred Hitchcock movies. But my chance to reassess this opinion arrived via my local cable company which is having an Alfred Hitchcock season in its "free movies on demand" section. Although many of my favourite Hitchcocks aren't there (no North By Northwest or The 39 Steps or The Lady Vanishes) many other good films are available including two classic Jimmy Stewart Hitchcocks: Rear Window and Vertigo. So, I got some popcorn, a couple of microbrews, a comfy chair and watched both.
...
Vertigo is the story of a San Francisco detective who follows a troubled woman and because of his fear of heights is unable to prevent her from killing herself. He later finds another woman who looks uncannily like the first. Complications ensue...The first thing to be said is that my estimation of Vertigo has gone up a little since my first viewing. Jimmy Stewart's performance is very strong, Kim Novak is a capable actress and the direction (apart from the cheesy back projection driving scenes) is visually striking and innovative. This was the film that introduced the "dolly out/zoom in" technique and the San Francisco exteriors are gorgeously shot. There are some nice surreal close ups of hands and parts of the face and the interiors are intentionally claustrophobic and eerily lit. The story is ridiculous but this isn't really a film about plot. Vertigo works best when Hitchcock allows Jimmy Stewart enough rope to let himself go ever so slightly unhinged in front of the camera. Stewart is a man who flew dozens of bombing missions over Europe in WW2 and who killed hundreds - maybe thousands - of people on those flights. Stewart's face is fascinating to watch in the final act of Vertigo. His eyes really are, in the words of that old cliche, windows into his soul. This is a complex human being letting us peer into the abyss with him. It's chilling and it took someone of Hitchcock's ability to get that performance out of him. Even with all that though, Vertigo is still more an academic's film that a film buff's film. It is boring and during those driving scenes its actually better to close your eyes and listen to the music. Bernard Hermann's score is extraordinary. At times soaring, lush, terrifying, beautiful. I think I still prefer his brilliant score for North By Northwest but the Vertigo soundtrack is his most romantic.
...
Rear Window is the story of a photographer with a broken leg stuck in his New York apartment; he's been spying on his neighbours during a long hot summer and he suspects that one of them might be a murderer. Rear Window is so light and fluffy and enjoyable that I've probably watched it 5 or 6 times before now. And as of last weekend it still holds up. The dialogue between Jimmy Stewart and his insurance company nurse sparkles; Grace Kelly, as Stewart's fashion model girlfriend, is radiant, funny and drop dead gorgeous in a series of lovely frocks; the visual story telling is witty and charming; and the plot is just about credible. The score isn't quite the masterpiece of Vertigo but who cares about the music when Grace Kelly is standing there in soft lighting offering you take out from 21. Stewart's performance is subtle and creepy: he and we are shared voyeurs who take delight in his crazy plan to put his beautiful girlfriend into jeopardy by invading the murderers apartment to look for evidence. If there's such a thing as a perfect Hitchcock film Rear Window might be it. I can't think of one thing I'd want to change. North By Northwest might be improved by a different female lead, Dial M For Murder might be more credible with a younger male lead, Vertigo and the Birds could have less back projection etc. But Rear Window, Psycho, The 39 Steps and a few others are so good that they shouldn't be messed with.
...
Who wins the battle of Vertigo versus Rear Window? Well I just read the Guardian review for a film about obsessed fans of The Shining called Room 237 which sounds great and I guess if you are an academic or one of these film obsessive types then Vertigo has got to be the one for you; however in my view Rear Window is more enjoyable and certainly if you haven't seen either it's the one I think you should check out.

39 comments:
Vertigo is the greatest movie of all time? Really? I saw it again a couple of years ago and liked it even less than I had before. Not as bad as The Man Who Knew Too Much, but close.
Rear Window, while it has a few holes--no one in his right mind sends Grace Kelly into the suspected killer's lair!--is not only great fun, but creepy for all the voyeuristic reasons you mentioned.
Dana
Yikes...Doris Day, what was anyone thinking?
As an aside I bet you in a modern film both Grace Kelly and Kim Novak would be told to lose weight by the director before shooting started. Both are completely normal looking women but they are not the stick thin waifs so beloved by todays misogynistic woman hating casting directors.
You're right: Vertigo's not even in the top 5 Hitch films. It's too long, the story's just that little bit too ridiculous, and Kim Novak is a second-rate actor with no real charisma. Rear Window has, in addition to all its other qualities, a sense of humor. And best of all it has that stunning and magical slow motion shot of Grace Kelly moving in to kiss a sleeping James Stewart when she first comes into the apartment. One piece of Rear Window trivia: the actor who played the piano player went on to create and voice the Chipmunks.
I'm with you on this: My estimation of Vertigo has gone up, but my estimation of Rear Window has no room to go any higher. I remember that Andrew Sarris once wrote that one of his great directors, probably Hitchcock, never got the critical respect he deserved because his movies were so much fun. Well, Rear Window is, if nothing else, more fun than Vertigo, whose occasional sombreness may be earning it new critical respect.
Dana: We will never agree on The Man Who Knew Too Much (have you ever seen the 1934 version?). It's not up there with Rear Window, Strangers on a Train, North by Northwest, Shadow of a Doubt, or The Lodger, but it's not bad.
Adrian, though I think I know what you're getting at, your comment may the first reference in human history to Grace Kelly as a "completely normal looking" woman. We don't like that kind of talk here in Philadelphia.
Cary
I think Kim Novak does have charisma but yeah she's a bit of a blank canvas as an actor. Rear Window has a sly sense of humour that hasnt dated at all.
Peter
Well ordinary is perhaps too strong a word for Grace Kelly. Theres a famous story about High Noon, when the producers saw the first cut it had all these bizarre lingering close ups of Grace Kelly because the director and editor had fallen in love with her...
Certainly Marilyn, Catherine Deneuve & Kim Novak would be told to lose some weight in today's Hollywood.
Incidentally if anyone has the same cable company as me Comcast/Xfinity you can now see 24 Party People as one of its free movies on demand, which was one of the flicks on my list of top ten films of the 2000's.
I definitely liked "Rear Window" better than "Vertigo" although I enjoyed it more in the theater (watching it from the balcony section). I didn't care for Kim Novak in that role.
I really enjoy most of Alfred Hitchcock's films, and Jimmy Stewart is one of my all-time favorite actors.
Have you seen "Rope"? I haven't seen it, although I tried when it was re-released in theaters by Jimmy Stewart almost 30 years ago. (I think he re-released it with "Vertigo", "Rear Window", and two others.)
I think the four Hitchcock films in that rerelease were Vertigo, Rear Window, The Trouble With Harry, and Rope. Rear Window has since been rerelased again, I think the big deal that time the restoration of the close-up, slow-motion kiss.
Now I'm going to have to wishlist the DVD's!
Am I allowed to post the link to the trailer?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxwyG6v9yB0
Peter: I have not seen the 1934 version. The 1956 version has too many implausible occurrences, topped off by the kid being able to hear her sing at the end, when, based on how it take to get them together, he must be half a mile away, though they are in the same building.
Stewart is great, though. He was an acquired taste for me. I had to get into my middle age before I appreciated him. As a kid i thought he was a doofus. As I got older I learned to recognize the menace in so many of his roles.
Verver
I liked the idea of Rope more than I liked the actual film itself.
There's a film called Swoon that no one's ever seen or heard of which is also about the Leopold and Loeb case, that I like if you can find it.
Dana
Man is not a great movie. But after that and The Wrong Man he went on to make NBNW, Vertigo and Psycho so there was life in the old dog yet.
Dana, I never thought Stewart a doofus, but my esteem for him grew during one of my viewings of Rear Window, when I realized how much he conveyed merely through facial expression. I also recall thinking he was especially good in Destry Rides Again.
Dana, the 1934 version of Thge Man Who Knew Too Much is much creepier and more gothic. It also lacks the implausibilities you found in thge later version.
It's a bit strange that Jimmy Stewart and Gary Cooper have a sort of equivalance in American film history. Stewart has often played an innocent, but you can see in his eyes that he isn't.
I am not as big a fan of Hitchcock as anyone else here is. It's a bit like Joyce for me--I acknowledge the greatness, but I feel this other current when it comes to women.
No mention of Strangers on a Train?
Seana
I think it was all those goofy appearances on Johnny Carson. In film he's a lot darker.
Speedskater
Love strangers on a train. In fact in Books To Die For that was the novel I chose to write about. There wasnt space to do an analysis of the movie but I really like the movie too. Book by Highsmith, direction by Hitchcock, screenplay by Chandler...
Adrian, I agree with your comments on "Strangers on a Train." I liked the book a lot (it was my first Highsmith book; I've read the entire "Ripliad" since) and think the movie a favorite Hitchcock.
Do you recall Hitch boarding a train with a cello in the movie?
Speedskater
Of course.
Every single Hitchcock cameo here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okLiLsncyi0
Its a really fun little compilation.
Speedskater
And I'm pretty sure it's a double bass. Why? Because double basses are funnier.
Yes, I just watched it. I'd recalled a cello, but the larger double bass is way funnier!
Double basses are especially funnier in Hitchcock's case because he looked like a double bass.
I saw a compilation of his cameos as an opener before the main movie at a Hitchcock festival, I think in Rome. I had one streak where on three consecutive trips to Europe, to three different countries, a Hitchcock festival was on in a city where I stayed.
Most ingenious of the Hitchcock cameos? Lifeboat rrnefer 30
Looks like a verification word snuck in there.
Personally, I blame Stewart's perceived persona on It's A Wonderful Life.
He played an aw-shucks type of guy in After the Thin Man, too.
Peter, Seana
I thought his performance in Its A Wonderful Life was pretty dark actually. In fact I think its a pretty dark film. The bad guys win, sort of and at its core there's a screaming black hole of existential angst.
And just before you say it, yes black holes can metaphorically scream...its all to do with Hawking radiation dontcha know.
Yeah, Screaming Black Holes. I used to catch their gigs in the 1990s. But I would like to see After a Wonderful Life, in which George Bailey is haunted by these dreams of alternative lives that he can't quite place, that he feels compelled to explore...
You can't expect to appreciate VERTIGO at first viewing. It is a movie meant to be watched the second time, then again and again.
Wendy Lesser, in NOTHING REMAINS THE SAME, had the same first experience as you.
Many years later, when Lesser watched VERTIGO again, she knew how it was going to end, so she could relax and study the movie from a different perspective.
The first time, she had seen it through the eyes of Scotty, Jimmy Stewart's character, skeptical but with some part of her believing in the ghost story. The impossible love story, which she had thought ridiculous and melodramatic, now seemed emotionally true: "This was what love was like."
And what was she learning from this second viewing of the movie?
"Well, all of the usual things that those of us who have ever had their hearts broken learn. That you temporarily lose yourself when you lose somebody you love. . .that you go looking for your former self as much as for your missing half. . .That love is mysterious and archaic, with something almost ghostly about it, so that being powerfully in love seems to take you back to some point of origin, back beyond your childhood to a past you couldn't actually have known."
"We are soul mates, we say. I seemed to have known him forever, we say. These are the banal, colloquial expressions of a feeling that Vertigo, with all of its dramatic excess, subtly and skillfully captures."
We know that the Madeline he lost and the Judy he has found are the same person, but we can see the emotional turmoil here much better, in Judy as well as Scotty. Lesser says,
"Like Judy, we in the audience continue to hold on to something from the Carlotta plot even though it has been proven a fake. This particular Hitchcock device is the very opposite of a MacGuffin: it is a story element so powerful that even after it has ceased to function in the mystery it persists in ghostly form in our imaginations."
"It is bigger than Gavin Elster, who created it, and much bigger than Judy, who embodied it. When we think about Kim Novak in this movie, it is Madeleine we remember, not Judy. . .
And because Madeleine exerts this powerful hold on us--from beyond the grave, as it were--we understand not just why Jimmy Stewart can't love Judy for her down-to-earth self, but also why Madeleine herself can't let go of Carlotta."
Our minds want them just to let go, to find a life, to be happy. We realize that this is not only fiction, it is fiction within fiction, yet we find ourselves caring for these characters.
Like many of us, they are caught in the web of their past which will not let them go.
"At the heart of the movie is a ghost story that doesn't really exist, not in the obvious sense, but because it has largely been made up by a character in the movie.
Galvin Elster constructs the tale of Carlotta Valdes, a long-dead woman whose spirit is now haunting Madeleine Elster, driving her toward madness and suicide."
The second time we watch this movie, we know that Scotty is being led through a maze of clues which have their own reality but are false in context. It is fascinating to watch, even though from your new perspective, you know what is going to happen. Lesser says:
"The longing to be haunted by something richer and more mystical than one's own daily existence--that is what Vertigo so cunningly enables us to feel.
You can call it romantic love, or the movies, or fiction, or ghosts, or history (Vertigo at various times calls it all of these), but whatever you decide to call it, you will not be able to rationalize it away by pointing to its invisibility, its patent nonpalpability. Whatever it is, it is there even when it is not there."
The absurdity in the vortex of human material existence is embodied in Jimmy Stewart's arms and hands, the way they hang at the end of the movie. A classic? I should say so.
Thank you for sharing the cameo link. I will keep an eye out for Swoon, too.
I also liked James Stewart in "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" although I haven't seen it since I was in college.
According to this article, it isn't the black hole that screams, but the star that screams as it's devoured.If we could hear it, it would be in the key of ultra-low D sharp. Which, uh, seems pretty specific.
I just realized that I did see Swoon, and liked it, but that was an awful long time ago.
Where are you seeing the Hitchcock stuff on Comcast. I think maybe I should give Vertigo another go.
The Cold Cold Ground is in our store as of this afternoon. Which is pretty cool, since it seems like we picked it up just under the wire in relation to Ultrastorm Sandy. Things are not moving east to west in the way they usually do right now.
Rich
The problem is that this was my SECOND viewing of Vertigo. On a screen small admittedly but still. I found myself slightly more warm to the film but honestly I think my overwhelming emotion was one of boredom, if it hadn't been for the score I think I may have given up on it completely and at a few points I was watching with my eyes closed which no director wants to hear I imagine.
Verver
He's good too in that cheesy one about the plane crashed in the desert whose name escapes me now.
Seana
I'm surprised that you've seen Swoon. I was reasonably certain only me and the director's immediate family had seen that. I liked it very much and often wondered what happened to that guy, but I see he went on to produced another one of my largely unseen favourites I Shot Andy Warhol.
Loved the Hitch cameo compilation. It made me remember a 1996 French film called L'appartement with Vincent Cassel and Monica Bellucci. It's intentionally reminiscent of Vertigo and is probably the best Hitchcokian film I've seen since the master went to the Bates motel in the sky.
The Nickelodeon theater shows a lot of movies that no one else ever sees. Maybe it's a portal to an alternate universe. I really am not at all as good as I was back then about going to movies. There are a lot of reasons why, but it's not really a good trend.
Post a Comment